Core Points - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Snap Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025 [1][2] - The lawsuit claims that Snap misled investors about its advertising revenue growth, which dropped from 9% in Q1 to only 1% in April 2025 [2] - Following the announcement of disappointing financial results on August 5, 2025, Snap's stock price fell from $9.39 to $7.78, a decline of approximately 17.15% in one day [2] Case Details - The complaint alleges that Snap provided overly positive statements while concealing material adverse facts about its advertising revenue growth [2] - Snap attributed the slowdown in advertising revenue growth to issues with its ad platform, the timing of Ramadan, and minor changes [2] - Investors affected by the decline in stock price have until October 20, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [3] Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions for shareholders over the past 20 years [4] - The firm has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4]

Core Insights - Snap Inc. has partnered with Epsilon to enable marketers to activate their first-party data on Snapchat, enhancing privacy-safe audience segmentation [1] - The integration has reportedly improved audience activation match rates by up to 50%, with Inspire Brands being one of the first to utilize this partnership [2] - The integration is currently available for Epsilon Clean Room clients in the U.S., with plans for expansion to the U.K. market [4] Company Strategies - Inspire Brands emphasizes data-driven marketing, aiming to connect more effectively with Gen Z and Millennial audiences through this integration [3] - Publicis clients benefit from easier and more efficient audience activation on Snapchat, with A/B testing showing higher audience match rates due to Epsilon's identity solution [5] - Epsilon Clean Room technology is becoming essential for marketers to activate and utilize first-party data from various sources [6] Market Developments - Publicis acquired Lotame, enhancing its data capabilities with information on nearly 4 billion consumers, which strengthens Epsilon's marketing capabilities [7] - The integration aims to provide brands with a more comprehensive understanding of their customers by resolving missing touchpoints and utilizing multidimensional data [8]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Snap Inc. securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 20, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Snap securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by October 20, 2025 [3]. - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience [4]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's management misled investors by presenting overly optimistic expectations regarding advertising revenue and growth, while downplaying significant execution errors and macroeconomic challenges [5]. - When the true situation regarding Snap's performance became known, investors reportedly suffered damages due to the misleading information provided during the Class Period [5].

Core Insights - Snap Inc. shares declined by 6.6% following Mizuho's initiation of coverage with a Neutral rating and a $9 price target, describing the company as a "show-me story" due to weak feedback from its advertising channels [1][2] Company Performance - Snap faced significant negative consequences from an "execution error" related to a recent change in its advertising platform, which was not disclosed to investors during the Class Period [5][8] - The company's Q2 2025 results revealed a slowdown in ad revenue growth, dropping from 9% in Q1 to just 1% in April, leading to a 17% stock price drop the following day [6] Legal Issues - A federal securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap and certain senior executives, alleging misleading representations regarding the performance and growth prospects of its digital advertising platform [2][5] - The lawsuit covers investors who purchased shares between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025 [7][11]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Snap Inc. securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, of the October 20, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Snap securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by October 20, 2025 [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's management misrepresented the company's advertising revenue and growth potential, leading to investor losses when the true situation was revealed [4]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [3]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, highlighting the firm's expertise and reputation in the field [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap, Inc. for allegedly providing misleading statements regarding its advertising revenue growth, leading to significant losses for investors during the specified period [8]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Snap's management made overly positive statements while concealing material adverse facts about the company's advertising revenue growth rate, which dropped from 9% in Q1 to only 1% in April [8]. - Snap's financial results announced on August 5, 2025, revealed a deceleration in advertising revenue growth, attributed to issues with their ad platform and other factors [8]. Stock Performance - Following the announcement of disappointing financial results, Snap's stock price fell from $9.39 per share on August 5, 2025, to $7.78 per share on August 6, 2025, marking a decline of approximately 17.15% in one day [8]. Legal Actions - Investors who purchased Snap securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire to discuss their legal rights and options [4][8]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is October 20, 2025 [8]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across the United States [5].

Core Insights - Snap Inc. shares declined by 6.6% following Mizuho's initiation of coverage with a Neutral rating and a $9 price target, describing the company as a "show-me story" due to weak feedback from its advertising channels [1][2] Legal Issues - A federal securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Snap and certain senior executives, alleging that the company misrepresented the performance and growth prospects of its digital advertising platform [2][6] - The lawsuit claims that Snap experienced significant negative consequences from an "execution error" related to a recent change in its ad platform, which was not disclosed to investors during the Class Period [6][11] - The alleged deception became apparent on August 5, 2025, when Snap reported Q2 2025 results, admitting to a change that caused campaigns to clear at substantially reduced prices, leading to a slowdown in ad revenue growth from 9% in Q1 to just 1% in April [7][11] Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit covers investors who purchased shares between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025 [8][10] - Hagens Berman, a shareholder rights firm, is investigating the claims and encourages affected investors to come forward [9][12]

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm is notifying shareholders of Snap Inc. regarding a potential class action lawsuit due to misleading statements about the company's advertising revenue growth, which significantly declined during the reported period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Allegations - The complaint alleges that Snap Inc. provided overly positive statements to investors while concealing material adverse facts about its advertising revenue growth rate, which fell from 9% in Q1 to only 1% in April 2025 [3]. Financial Impact - On August 5, 2025, Snap announced a deceleration in advertising revenue growth, attributing it to issues with its ad platform and other factors. Following this announcement, Snap's stock price dropped from $9.39 to $7.78 per share, a decline of approximately 17.15% in one day [3]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from April 29, 2025, to August 5, 2025. Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by October 20, 2025, to participate in potential recovery [4]. Law Firm's Mission - The Gross Law Firm aims to protect investors' rights and seeks recovery for those who suffered losses due to false or misleading statements by companies, emphasizing the importance of responsible business practices [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Snap Inc. securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 20, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Snap securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without incurring out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by October 20, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's management misled investors by presenting an overly optimistic view of the company's advertising revenue and growth potential while downplaying significant execution errors and macroeconomic challenges [5]. - When the true state of Snap's performance became known, investors reportedly suffered damages due to the misleading information provided during the Class Period [5].

Group 1 - JPMorgan's analysts provided a list of 27 stocks as potential short-selling opportunities, including a major airline and a burger chain [2][9] - Short-selling is a strategy for investors who believe that certain stocks are likely to decline in value [3] - Southwest Airlines (LUV) has seen a 7% decline in stock price this year, contrasting with the S&P 500's 12% increase [3][4] Group 2 - Analysts expressed concerns about Southwest Airlines' stock valuation despite promising demand trends and ambitious fourth-quarter guidance [4] - Shake Shack (SHAK) has lost approximately one-third of its value this year, with high menu prices potentially limiting growth opportunities [4][5] - Bumble (BMBL) shares have fallen nearly 40% in 2025, with worries about declining app usage and marketing expenditures impacting margins [5][6] Group 3 - Rivian (RIVN) stock is down nearly 4% this year, with expectations that the expiration of federal EV tax credits will negatively affect demand [6][7] - Other companies highlighted include Krispy Kreme (DNUT), facing balance-sheet issues, and Travelers (TRV), which has overly optimistic consensus estimates [8] - Snap (SNAP) is expected to struggle against competitors using AI more effectively, while Mobileye Global (MBLY) has a premium valuation not supported by revenue growth expectations [8]