Travere Therapeutics(TVTX) - 2019 Q4 - Annual Report

Clinical Development - The company is focused on developing therapies for rare diseases, with multiple late clinical-stage programs targeting significant unmet medical needs [20]. - Sparsentan is currently in two pivotal Phase 3 clinical studies for FSGS and IgAN, with approximately 300 patients enrolled in the DUPLEX Study and 280 patients in the PROTECT Study [24][25]. - The interim analysis of the DUPLEX Study is expected to provide top-line data in the first half of 2021, while the PROTECT Study's primary endpoint data is anticipated in the first half of 2022 [24][25]. - Chenodal is being evaluated in a Phase 3 clinical trial for CTX, with the RESTORE study aimed at supporting an NDA submission in the U.S. [29]. - The company has discontinued the development of fosmetpantotenate for PKAN and the L-UDCA program, resulting in impairments of $15.0 million and $25.5 million respectively [33][36]. - The company is developing sparsentan in Phase 3 clinical trials for treating FSGS and IgAN, both rare diseases, but may face challenges in patient enrollment due to competition for eligible participants [157]. - The company initiated the RESTORE study in January 2020 to evaluate Chenodal for CTX, which has been the standard of care for over three decades but requires FDA approval for marketing [158]. - The DUPLEX Study and PROTECT Study for sparsentan are being conducted under the Subpart H pathway for potential accelerated approval in the U.S. and Conditional Marketing Authorization in Europe, based on changes in proteinuria [164]. - The company has received feedback from the FDA indicating openness to accept substantial treatment effects on proteinuria for accelerated approval, but there is no guarantee that the data will be sufficient for an NDA filing [165]. - The company acknowledges that success in early clinical trials does not guarantee success in later trials, as demonstrated by the Phase 3 FORT Study not meeting its primary endpoint [161]. - The company may need to conduct additional clinical trials or testing if initial results are not positive, which could lead to increased development costs and delays [157]. Product Pipeline and Market Exclusivity - Cholbam, approved in March 2015, is the first FDA-approved treatment for bile acid synthesis disorders, with an estimated 200 to 300 patients currently eligible for therapy [30]. - Thiola and Thiola EC are approved for treating cystinuria, with an estimated 10,000 to 12,000 individuals affected in the U.S., and the new formulation offers improved administration options [32]. - Chenodal received orphan drug designation in the U.S. in 2010, potentially granting seven years of marketing exclusivity upon FDA approval [67]. - Cholbam is expected to have marketing exclusivity in the U.S. until March 2022 due to its orphan drug designation [68]. - The company expects to rely on orphan drug status for sparsentan, which provides seven years of marketing exclusivity in the U.S. and up to ten years in Europe [216]. - The company has obtained orphan drug designation for Cholbam/Kolbam, which provides a period of marketing exclusivity, but this could be challenged by competitive products [191]. Commercialization Strategy - The company aims to build a sustainable pipeline by selectively acquiring orphan drug candidates and employing rigorous decision criteria for development [42]. - The company plans to evaluate commercialization strategies on a product-by-product basis to maximize value, including potential joint marketing partnerships and out-licensing [42]. - The commercial success of Chenodal, Cholbam, and Thiola depends on their perceived effectiveness and advantages over competing therapies, as well as third-party payer coverage and reimbursement policies [175]. - The company is currently facing generic competition for its products, particularly Thiola, which is subject to immediate competition from compounded and generic entrants due to the lack of patent exclusivity [177]. - Recent regulatory initiatives, such as the CREATES Act, aim to encourage generic competition, potentially impacting the company's sales and profitability if generic versions of its products are approved [178]. - The company is defending a lawsuit from Spring Pharmaceuticals alleging refusal to sell samples of Thiola for bioequivalence studies, which could lead to reputational harm and additional costs [179]. Regulatory Environment - The FDA review process for standard review drug products typically takes about 10 months, while priority review drugs are reviewed within eight months [96]. - The FDA may grant orphan drug designation for drugs intended to treat rare diseases, providing a seven-year exclusive marketing period for the first approved applicant [103]. - Fast Track designation facilitates the development of drugs for serious conditions, allowing for early and frequent communication with the FDA [104][105]. - Accelerated Approval may be granted for drugs providing meaningful therapeutic benefits based on surrogate endpoints [106]. - Regulatory compliance requires substantial time and financial resources, impacting product development and marketing [86]. - The company is subject to post-approval requirements including adverse event reporting and periodic reports following FDA approval of an NDA [115]. - The company must comply with stringent FDA regulations regarding marketing and promotion of drugs post-approval [114]. - The company is subject to various federal and state healthcare regulations, including the anti-kickback statute and the False Claims Act, which could lead to significant penalties if violated [130][136]. - The company must comply with the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, requiring annual reporting of certain payments to physicians and teaching hospitals [134]. - The company is subject to foreign regulations governing clinical trials and product marketing, which vary significantly by country [138]. - The centralized procedure for marketing authorization in the EU allows for approval across all 27 EU member states, with a maximum evaluation timeframe of 210 days [141]. - Data exclusivity in Europe lasts for 8 years from the first authorization, with an additional 2 years of market exclusivity for certain products [143]. - The company is required to provide rebates and discounts for drugs covered under government programs like Medicaid and Medicare [117]. - The company may be impacted by future legislation that could affect coverage and reimbursement rates for its products [120]. - The company is required to implement compliance programs and adhere to marketing codes as mandated by various state regulations [135]. - The company is subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA to ensure compliance with cGMPs [115]. - The company may face restrictions on marketing or manufacturing if unknown problems with a product are discovered post-approval [116]. Financial Considerations - The competitive landscape for orphan drugs is intense, with significant resources invested by larger pharmaceutical companies [38]. - The average Medicaid drug rebate has increased from 15.1% to 23.1% of the average manufacturer price due to the PPACA [121]. - The company faces potential downward pressure on product pricing due to increasing legislative and regulatory scrutiny on drug pricing practices [125]. - The company must navigate complex reimbursement processes from third-party payers, which can vary significantly and impact product acceptance [118]. - Changes in reimbursement practices by third-party payers may adversely affect demand and pricing for the company's products, impacting overall sales and profitability [184]. - The company relies on third-party manufacturers for its products, which poses risks to timely delivery and compliance with regulatory standards, potentially affecting revenues [186]. - The company has no in-house distribution channels and depends on a third-party distributor, which could lead to disruptions in product distribution and lost revenues if issues arise [187]. - The company is subject to unfavorable pricing regulations and third-party reimbursement practices due to healthcare reforms, which could harm its business [218]. Intellectual Property - The patent portfolio for sparsentan includes two U.S. patents and a European patent, expected to expire in March 2030 [59]. - The company has exclusive licenses for U.S. Patents No. 6,638,937, 9,662,312, and 9,993,461, covering the use of sparsentan for treating glomerulosclerosis and IgA nephropathy, with expiration dates in 2019 and 2030 [210]. - The company expects to obtain five to seven years of regulatory exclusivity for new chemical entities under the FDC Act, along with potential patent term extensions [211]. - The company has negotiated a license agreement with Ligand Pharmaceuticals for sparsentan, which subjects it to various commercialization and reporting obligations [212]. - The company has obtained U.S. and European patents for sparsentan but faces uncertainty regarding the ability to enforce these patents against competitors [213]. - The company may face patent infringement claims that could hinder the commercialization of its products [214]. - The company does not currently have patent protection for its commercial products, which could adversely affect the value of its technology and products [205]. - The company may face challenges in obtaining and maintaining intellectual property protection, which is critical for its competitive position in the market [208]. Workforce and Operations - The company had 221 employees as of January 31, 2020 [148]. - The company relies on independent clinical investigators and contract research organizations to conduct clinical trials, and their performance is critical to the timely approval of FDA applications [174].