Core Viewpoint - BlackRock and the state of Tennessee have reached a settlement regarding a lawsuit that claimed the firm downplayed the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) proposals in its investment processes, marking a significant win for states opposing ESG initiatives [1][4]. Group 1: Settlement Details - The settlement requires BlackRock to enhance transparency, undergo regular audits, provide compliance training, cooperate with the attorney general, improve investor communications, and commit to prioritizing financial interests [3]. - Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti stated that the settlement ensures that retirement funds for Tennesseans will not support ideologies they oppose [2]. - BlackRock expressed satisfaction with the resolution, emphasizing its commitment to acting in the best interests of clients and increasing transparency about its practices [5]. Group 2: Legal Context and Implications - The lawsuit, filed in 2023, accused BlackRock of making misleading statements regarding the extent to which ESG proposals influenced its investments, a claim that BlackRock has dismissed as inaccurate [3][9]. - The settlement does not involve any penalties, fines, or admissions of wrongdoing by BlackRock [5]. - This settlement may set a precedent for other ongoing legal challenges against ESG investing, particularly in the context of a coalition of states that have accused major asset managers of colluding to influence coal production negatively [8].
BlackRock, Tennessee settle lawsuit over firm's ‘misleading' ESG strategy