A Total Win for Rumble and Trump Media: Statement on U.S. Court's Order on Moraes's Directives

Core Viewpoint - Rumble celebrates a U.S. federal court ruling that Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's censorship orders lack legal force in the United States, marking a victory for free speech and digital sovereignty [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Court Ruling Details - The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida ruled that Moraes's directives were not properly served under U.S. or international law, as they were not delivered through valid legal mechanisms [2]. - The court emphasized that Rumble and Trump Media are not obligated to comply with these unlawful censorship demands, and no U.S. entity is required to enforce them [2][3]. Group 2: Implications of the Ruling - The ruling indicates that any attempts to enforce these illegal orders on U.S. soil will be met with intervention to protect American companies and uphold free speech [3]. - The case is positioned as a broader fight against foreign judicial overreach attempting to silence speech in the U.S., reinforcing that such censorship has no place in the country [4]. Group 3: Company Background - Rumble is described as a high-growth video platform and cloud services provider focused on creating an independent infrastructure and restoring the internet to its free and open roots [5].