Deepseek“评”ESG报告|华发股份：绿色转型提速，治理能力待夯实

Core Viewpoint - Huafa Co., Ltd. has accelerated its green transformation and improved its governance capabilities, as highlighted in its second ESG report, which integrates social responsibility and sustainable development [1][2]. Group 1: ESG Highlights - The company has established a three-tier ESG management system, with independent directors accounting for 36% of the board. It held 15 board meetings and 8 audit committee meetings throughout the year [1]. - The company has implemented anti-corruption training for all employees and has an effective whistleblower handling mechanism [1]. - Huafa has completed 16 projects that meet green building standards, with a renewable energy utilization rate of 32.5% in the Shanghai Gumei Yuehua project. The proportion of prefabricated buildings has increased to 34%, saving 36,900 tons of standard coal [1]. - Employee training investment reached 8.52 million yuan, and over 100 middle managers were trained through campus recruitment programs [1]. - The company donated 34.35 million yuan externally and has been involved in the Chinese white dolphin protection project for six years, engaging over 10,000 participants in ecological public welfare activities [1]. Group 2: ESG Shortcomings - The climate risk assessment has not been fully integrated into the decision-making system, and specific data on supply chain carbon management has not been disclosed [1]. - Key indicators such as the proportion of green suppliers are missing, and there is a lack of quantitative goals for biodiversity impact assessments during construction [1]. - Key data on Scope 3 carbon emissions and water resource consumption intensity have not been fully presented [1][2]. Group 3: Overall Evaluation - Huafa Co., Ltd. demonstrates strong execution in ESG management, particularly in establishing technical standards in green buildings and smart homes, earning recognition as one of the "Top 50 ESG Pioneers in the Greater Bay Area" [2]. - However, the application of climate risk management frameworks is insufficient, and biodiversity protection remains project-based [2]. - Recommendations include strengthening ESG controls in the supply chain, establishing scientific carbon targets, and incorporating ecological indicators into project KPI systems [2].