Meta's oversight board rips Zuckerberg's move to end fact-checking: ‘Potential adverse effects'

Core Viewpoint - Meta's independent oversight board criticized the company for hastily removing its fact-checking policy, urging an assessment of potential adverse effects [1][6][10] Group 1: Oversight Board's Rulings - The board upheld some of Meta's decisions to keep controversial content while ordering the removal of posts containing racist slurs [2][7] - The board issued 17 recommendations for improving enforcement of bullying and harassment policies and clarifying banned ideologies [9][10] Group 2: Changes in Content Moderation - Meta replaced its fact-checking policies with a "Community Notes" model, similar to the approach used by Elon Musk's platform X [6][7] - The rule change allowed derogatory references to marginalized groups, focusing instead on detecting terrorism, child exploitation, and fraud [7][10] Group 3: Relationship with Political Figures - Mark Zuckerberg sought to align with the incoming Trump administration, dining with Trump and donating $1 million to his inaugural fund [3][12] - Zuckerberg's actions reflect a strategy to gain favor with political leadership, which has influenced Meta's content moderation policies [2][3] Group 4: Financial Commitment to Oversight Board - Meta has committed to funding the oversight board through 2027, allocating at least$35 million annually over the next three years [12][13]