Group 1 - The legal opinion is issued regarding the differentiated equity distribution related to Beijing JianKai Technology Co., Ltd.'s 2024 annual profit distribution [1][2] - The company plans to distribute a cash dividend of 1.50 RMB (including tax) for every 10 shares, with a total of 60,650,700 shares, excluding 147,914 shares held in the repurchase account [4][5] - The total cash dividend to be distributed amounts to approximately 9,075,417.90 RMB (including tax) [4][5] Group 2 - The differentiated equity distribution is based on the total share capital minus the shares in the repurchase account, resulting in 60,502,786 shares eligible for profit distribution [5][6] - The reference price for ex-rights and ex-dividends is calculated based on the previous closing price and the cash dividend, with minimal impact on the share price [6] - The legal opinion concludes that the differentiated equity distribution complies with relevant laws and regulations, ensuring no harm to the company or shareholders [7]

Group 1 - The legal opinion letter was issued by Beijing Times Jiuhua Law Firm regarding the annual shareholders' meeting of Beijing JianKai Technology Co., Ltd. [1][2] - The law firm confirmed that the documents provided by the company for the shareholders' meeting were authentic, accurate, complete, and valid [2][3] - The law firm verified the procedures for convening and holding the shareholders' meeting, the qualifications of attendees, and the voting procedures, concluding that they complied with relevant laws and regulations [5][15] Group 2 - The shareholders' meeting was held on June 10, 2025, with a total of 60 attendees representing 26,309,644 shares, accounting for 43.4850% of the total voting shares [6][7] - The meeting was presided over by the company's chairman, and the voting was conducted both in-person and via the Shanghai Stock Exchange's online voting system [5][6] - The voting results for various agenda items were overwhelmingly in favor, with no objections raised by attendees [9][10][11] Group 3 - The legal opinion concluded that the convening and holding procedures, attendee qualifications, and voting procedures of the shareholders' meeting were all in compliance with the Company Law and other relevant regulations [16] - The voting results were deemed legal and valid, confirming the legitimacy of the decisions made during the meeting [15][16]