RT Sarah Wynn (@ForTheWynn_)The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is joining forces with the Securities and Exchange Commission on “Project Crypto,” an initiative aimed at modernizing cryptocurrency regulation.This comes as lawmakers are working on crypto legislation. "The U.S. is now the crypto capital of the world," said CFTC Chair Michael Selig on Thursday. "But we cannot assume this will always be the case. America’s financial regulators must modernize and harmonize their approach to regulation to fu ...

Core Viewpoint - The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) filed an amicus curiae brief supporting the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court to hear the case Media Matters for America v. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), emphasizing the need for judicial review of agency actions that may violate constitutional rights [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Context and Precedents - The Supreme Court's ruling in April 2023 allows individuals to challenge government agencies in federal court before undergoing administrative adjudications, overturning previous circuit court decisions that limited access to judicial review [2]. - Previous Supreme Court decisions, including Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and SEC v. Jarkesy, established that district courts have jurisdiction over constitutional claims against agencies, reinforcing the right to a neutral adjudicator [3]. Group 2: Agency's Position and Critique - The FTC argues that it has jurisdiction over the case based on the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, claiming authority to enforce its Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) in court, but this position is contested as Media Matters initiated the lawsuit [3]. - NCLA critiques the FTC's attempt to manage disputes internally, arguing that such a system undermines the judicial power and the right of individuals to seek redress in court for constitutional violations [4][5]. Group 3: Statements from NCLA - NCLA representatives assert that administrative agencies cannot displace judicial power, especially in cases questioning their constitutional compliance, and emphasize the necessity for courts to address such claims promptly [4]. - The organization expresses concern over the current administration's resistance to federal district court jurisdiction, highlighting the importance of allowing defendants in agency actions to contest constitutional issues in court [5].

Core Viewpoint - The SEC's proposed rule changes aim to redefine which investment advisors qualify as "small entities" by raising the asset threshold from $25 million to $1 billion, potentially impacting regulatory compliance and economic analysis for these firms [2][3]. Group 1: Proposed Rule Changes - The SEC proposed amendments to clarify the definition of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, increasing the asset threshold for investment advisors from $25 million to $1 billion [2]. - The rule requires federal agencies to analyze and minimize the economic impact of regulations on smaller companies [2]. Group 2: Industry Reactions - SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated that the proposals align with the SEC's goal to modernize regulatory requirements and better promote the effectiveness of regulations for small entities [3]. - MarketCounsel CEO Brian Hamburger noted that the changes should lead to more tailored regulations, with realistic compliance times and reduced documentation requirements, although the number of rules may not decrease immediately [4]. - The Investment Adviser Association has advocated for increasing the AUM threshold for small entity investment advisors for a considerable time [5]. Group 3: Current Regulatory Context - Under current rules, an investment company is considered a "small entity" if its net assets are under $50 million, while an investment advisor is deemed "small" if their assets under management do not exceed $25 million [4]. - Many advisors cannot register with the SEC unless they manage at least $100 million in assets, rendering the $25 million threshold for small entities largely ineffective [6].

Core Viewpoint - The SEC proposed amendments to the rules defining which registered investment companies, investment advisers, and business development companies qualify as small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, aiming to better address the regulatory challenges faced by these entities [1][2]. Group 1: Proposed Changes - The proposal aims to increase the asset-based thresholds under which investment companies and investment advisers are classified as small entities [4]. - It seeks to update the method for aggregating related funds' assets for the purpose of defining small entities [4]. - The proposal includes provisions for inflation adjustments to the asset-based thresholds every 10 years [4]. Group 2: SEC's Commitment - The SEC emphasizes its commitment to understanding and addressing the concerns of small entities, with the proposal reflecting its intent to modernize regulatory requirements [3]. - The changes are designed to promote the effectiveness and efficiency of regulations while minimizing the economic impact on small entities [3].

Core Viewpoint - Trading in MaxsMaking Inc. has been halted by Nasdaq for additional information requested from the company following a previous trading suspension by the SEC [1][2]. Group 1: Trading Suspension Details - The SEC suspended trading in MaxsMaking Inc. from 04:00 on November 17, 2025, to 23:59 on December 1, 2025 [1]. - The last sale price of MaxsMaking Inc. shares was $13.00 prior to the trading halt [1]. Group 2: Nasdaq's Request - Trading will remain halted until MaxsMaking Inc. fully satisfies Nasdaq's request for additional information [2].

Two US senators have proposed a bipartisan bill to shift cryptocurrency oversight from the Securities and Exchange Commission to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — a move long favored by the industry https://t.co/IJE1pnn0jr ...

Core Viewpoint - Trading in Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. has been halted by Nasdaq for additional information requested from the company, following a previous trading suspension by the SEC [1][2]. Group 1: Company Information - The last sale price of Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.'s ordinary shares was $3.75 [1]. - Trading will remain halted until the company fully satisfies Nasdaq's request for additional information [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The SEC had previously suspended trading in Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. from 04:00 on October 23, 2025, to 23:59 on November 5, 2025 [1].

The month-long government shutdown is delaying the Securities and Exchange Commission’s work to make it easier for 401(k) plan managers to include private credit and other alternative assets in their offerings https://t.co/4UtgetzLUU ...

Core Points - Trading in Platinum Analytics Cayman Limited (Nasdaq: PLTS) has been halted by Nasdaq for additional information requested from the company [1] - The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) previously suspended trading in PLTS from October 6, 2025, to October 17, 2025 [1] - The last sale price of PLTS ordinary shares was $17.50 [1] Summary by Sections - **Trading Suspension** - Nasdaq has halted trading in PLTS until the company provides the requested information [1][2] - The SEC's trading suspension lasted from 04:00 on October 6, 2025, to 23:59 on October 17, 2025 [1] - **Company Information** - For further details regarding the SEC's order, additional information can be found on the SEC's website [2] - Investors can check for news and updates about PLTS directly through the Nasdaq website [2]

Core Points - Trading in QMMM Holdings Limited has been halted by Nasdaq for additional information requested from the company [1] - The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) previously suspended trading in QMMM from September 29, 2025, to October 10, 2025 [1] - The last sale price of QMMM's ordinary shares was $119.40 [1] Summary by Sections - **Trading Suspension** - Nasdaq has halted trading in QMMM Holdings Limited pending further information [1] - The SEC's trading suspension was in effect from 04:00 on September 29, 2025, to 23:59 on October 10, 2025 [1] - **Company Information** - Trading will remain halted until QMMM Holdings Limited fully satisfies Nasdaq's request for additional information [2] - For further news and information, stakeholders are advised to contact the company directly or check under the company's symbol on the Nasdaq website [2] - **Contact Information** - Nasdaq Media Contact: Michelle Mendiola, email: michelle.mendiola@nasdaq.com [4] - Additional information about Nasdaq can be found on their official website [3]