Financial Data and Key Metrics - Net income for Q1 2025 was 112million,up3682.7 million [10] - Earnings per share grew 40% YoY to 1.93[10]−Returnonaveragecommonequitywas19.119.3 billion [6] - Deposits grew by 614millionQoQ,with9613.3 million) and commercial real estate (14.5 million) [13][14] - C&I asset-based and cash flow lending saw a 40 million increase in non-performing assets [16] - Axos Clearing deposits remained flat at 1.3billion,with800 million on the balance sheet and 450millionatpartnerbanks[30]MarketandGeographicPerformance−Consumerandsmallbusinessdepositsrepresented6010 million specific loan provision for a C&I loan classified as nonaccrual [17] - Non-interest expenses increased by 6.9millionQoQ,drivenbyhighersalariesandbenefitsrelatedtonewhires[39]−Theloanpipelineremainsstrongat1.9 billion, with growth expected in SFR jumbo mortgages, multifamily, and commercial loans [40] Q&A Session Summary Question: Competition and Loan Pricing - Management noted increased pricing pressure in certain verticals, particularly in C&I lending, but remains confident in achieving loan growth [43] Question: Fee Income and Rate Sensitivity - Fee income was impacted by prepayment penalty fees and a mark on the servicing book due to rate declines [44][45] - Management expects fee income growth in the securities business as net new assets increase [46] Question: Deposit Repricing and Growth Opportunities - The company has successfully repriced deposits ahead of rate cuts and sees growth opportunities in C&I verticals and middle-market lending [65][66] Question: Commercial Real Estate Exposure - Axos remains interested in growing its commercial real estate book but faces challenges due to fewer deals and early repayments by bridge lenders [84] Question: Loan Pricing and Margin Outlook - Management expects some pricing concessions to maintain loan growth but remains optimistic about the margin outlook, supported by loan repricing and deposit cost management [81][98] Question: Loan Underwriting and Participation - The company emphasized its strong underwriting standards, particularly in commercial real estate, and noted variations in loan participation across different business lines [89][92]