Domestic Laws and Protectionism in Government Procurement

Investment Rating - The report does not provide a specific investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The paper highlights the significant impact of domestic laws on government procurement, particularly focusing on protectionist measures that favor domestic suppliers over foreign competitors [2][9] - A novel dataset covering 141 countries reveals that 124 countries have preferential treatment provisions, indicating a widespread adoption of protectionist policies [2][11] - The analysis shows a negative correlation between protectionist procurement policies and trade openness, with countries exhibiting more protectionist laws trading more domestically than internationally [2][12] Summary by Sections Introduction - Government procurement accounts for 12% of global GDP as of 2019, with increased scrutiny on its allocation due to the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical crises [7] - Governments utilize procurement to achieve socioeconomic goals, which can lead to protectionist policies that limit foreign supplier participation [8] Literature Review - The literature indicates that protectionist rules in government procurement can significantly affect trade flows and economic efficiency [20][22] - Empirical studies have shown that countries with higher government spending tend to import less, suggesting the presence of protectionism [23] Data and Descriptive Evidence - A unique dataset was compiled to analyze procurement laws and trade data, focusing on discriminatory practices against foreign firms [28] - The analysis identifies three main types of protectionist measures: lack of equal treatment, preferential treatment for domestic bidders, and domestic sourcing requirements [30][31] Results on Trade Openness and Protectionism - Cross-country regression results indicate that countries with protectionist procurement laws have an import share in total spending that is 20% lower compared to less protectionist countries [45][48] - The negative correlation between protectionism and trade openness is particularly strong in the manufacturing and primary sectors [49][50] Gravity Model Estimations - Gravity model estimations confirm that protectionist measures in government procurement lead to a significant "border effect," where domestic purchases are substantially higher than international ones in more protectionist countries [54][57]