据新华社1月7日报道，美国欧洲司令部7日宣布，美方已在北大西洋扣押"贝拉1"号油轮，称该油轮违反美国制裁措施。据CCTV国际时讯报道，美国军方 此前曾表示，已采取行动试图扣押一艘从委内瑞拉出发的油轮。该油轮在航行期间据称由一艘俄罗斯潜艇护航。美军动用了直升机和海岸警卫队舰艇，对 涉事油轮实施拦截。据称，美方已在大西洋上对"水手"号进行超过两周的追踪。该油轮就是此前名为"贝拉1"号的油轮。 每经编辑｜程鹏 日前，美国对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击，并强行控制委内瑞拉总统马杜罗，引发国际社会关注。 俄外交部此前表示： 密切关注俄油轮受美军方追踪一事 综合CCTV国际时讯、新华社报道，当地时间1月7日消息，美方已扣押"水手"号油轮，美方人员已登上油轮。美国欧洲司令部在社交媒体上发布的消息 称，该油轮被美国海岸警卫队"芒罗"号追踪后，在北大西洋海域被扣押。美国欧洲司令部称，此次扣押行动系执行美国总统令。 美国国防部长赫格塞思转发美国欧洲司令部声明称，美国对受制裁的委内瑞拉石油实施的封锁"在世界任何地方"仍然完全有效。 1月7日，据@CCTV国际时讯援引美国《华尔街日报》报道称，美国军方官员表示，美军已采取行动试图扣押一 ...

新华社华盛顿1月7日电 美国欧洲司令部7日宣布，美方已在北大西洋扣押"贝拉1"号油轮。 ...

美国试图在大西洋扣押与俄罗斯有关联的油轮。 ...

市场消息：美国在北大西洋靠近与俄罗斯有关联的油轮附近进行侦察飞行。 ...

证券日报网讯1月5日，大西洋在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，截至2025年12月31日公司股东总数为 47202户。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The EU's enforcement of the Digital Services Act has escalated tensions between the US and EU, with the US imposing travel restrictions on European officials in response to a significant fine levied against Musk's platform X [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Context - The EU's Digital Services Act, enacted in 2022, mandates large internet platforms to prevent the spread of illegal content and hate speech, impacting major US tech companies like Apple, Google, and X [3][5]. - The first fine under this act was imposed on X, amounting to €120 million, which has drawn strong discontent from the US [3][5]. Group 2: Political Implications - The US sanctions against European officials are seen as a challenge to the EU's digital governance authority, indicating a shift from policy disagreements to a more profound political conflict [3][6]. - The ongoing digital regulatory dispute is expected to evolve into a direct conflict over rule-making authority and governance boundaries by 2026 [3][10]. Group 3: Internal Pressures - Both the US and EU face internal pressures to adopt more aggressive stances in their digital regulatory approaches, with US lawmakers advocating for harsher measures against EU officials [6][7]. - The EU is experiencing internal divisions regarding its response to US sanctions, with some leaders calling for a stronger stance against US tech companies [8][9]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The digital governance conflict reflects deeper ideological divides between the US and EU, with the US viewing the Digital Services Act as a tool for censorship, while the EU sees it as essential for curbing hate speech [10][11]. - The situation is indicative of a broader cultural and political clash between the Trump administration and Europe, suggesting that the transatlantic relationship has fundamentally changed [11].

Core Viewpoint - The EU's enforcement of the Digital Services Act has escalated tensions between the US and Europe, with the US imposing travel restrictions on EU officials in response to a significant fine levied against Musk's platform X [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Context - The EU's Digital Services Act, passed in 2022, mandates large internet platforms to prevent the spread of illegal content and hate speech, impacting major US tech companies like Apple, Google, and X [3][5]. - The first fine under this act was imposed on X, amounting to €120 million (approximately $130 million), which has drawn strong discontent from the US [3][5]. Group 2: Political Implications - The US sanctions against EU officials are seen as a challenge to the EU's digital governance authority, indicating a shift from mere policy disagreements to a deeper political conflict [3][6]. - The US government has previously threatened retaliation against the EU's digital regulations, using them as leverage in trade negotiations [6][7]. Group 3: Internal Pressures - Both the US and EU face internal pressures to adopt more aggressive stances in their digital regulatory disputes, with US lawmakers advocating for harsher measures against EU officials [7][10]. - The EU Commission's cautious response to US sanctions has sparked debate within Europe, with some leaders calling for a stronger stance against US actions [10][12]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The ongoing digital dispute reflects fundamental differences in governance philosophies between the US and EU, with potential for further escalation as both sides prepare for future regulatory actions [15][16]. - The EU's ability to assert its digital sovereignty and respond effectively to US pressures will be critical in shaping the future of transatlantic relations [16].

Core Viewpoint - The European Commission issued its first "non-compliance decision" under the Digital Services Act, imposing a fine of €120 million on the social media platform X, owned by billionaire Elon Musk. This action has led to the U.S. imposing travel restrictions on five European individuals, including former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, who was instrumental in drafting the Digital Services Act. Analysts suggest that the U.S. sanctions are aimed at challenging the EU's digital governance authority and exerting long-term pressure on its regulatory enforcement. The digital regulatory dispute between the U.S. and EU is expected to evolve into a direct conflict over rule dominance and governance boundaries by 2026, becoming a new focal point of transatlantic tensions [1]. Group 1 - The European Commission fined the social media platform X €120 million for non-compliance with the Digital Services Act [1] - The U.S. imposed travel restrictions on five European individuals, including Thierry Breton, in response to the fine [1] - Analysts believe the U.S. sanctions challenge the EU's digital governance authority and aim to create long-term pressure on its regulatory framework [1] Group 2 - The digital regulatory dispute between the U.S. and EU is expected to escalate beyond policy differences [1] - There is a possibility of direct conflicts over rule dominance and governance boundaries by 2026 [1] - This situation may become a new focal point of transatlantic tensions [1]

用东海的水养出了大西洋鲑。 浙江省宁波市象山县出产黄鱼和梭子蟹等海鲜，在长三角地区早已颇有盛名。不过从2024年开始，从象 山县还"游"出了新品种——大西洋鲑。 用东海之水在陆地上养殖三文鱼，已经成为现实。 大西洋鲑俗称三文鱼，中国市场上的冰鲜三文鱼，主要是来自挪威等中高纬度国家的养殖产品。而如今 在象山县高塘岛乡临海边的高大厂房内，依靠着现代技术在封闭的环境中，也养成了血统纯正的陆基大 西洋鲑。陆基养殖是指在陆地上建设养殖池设施的养殖模式。 养殖企业诺帝克水产（宁波）有限公司（以下简称"诺蒂克"）总经理童安睿（Andreas Thorud）告诉第 一财经记者，中国对三文鱼的需求每年剧增，让企业看到了机遇，相比进口三文鱼，在宁波象山出产的 三文鱼更加贴近市场，更能保持新鲜度，同时在封闭环境下养殖，无需担心寄生虫问题，食品更加安 全。 养殖不易 三文鱼在中国市场上越卖越火，从原先的一二线城市，如今已经下沉到三四线城市。这一趋势在数据上 也有所反映，据统计，2025年1月至9日，挪威向中国出口三文鱼6.94万吨，同比大幅增长112.1%，中国 已成为挪威三文鱼全球第六大出口市场，也是前十大市场中增长最快的市场。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, responded to an article from The Atlantic labeling him a "scientific racist," criticizing the publication's funding by the late Steve Jobs' widow, Lauren Jobs, and also targeting MacKenzie Scott's charitable donations [1][5][6]. Group 1: Musk's Criticism of The Atlantic - Musk described The Atlantic as a "fake publication" that survives on money from Lauren Jobs, which he believes her late husband would have despised [6]. - He emphasized that "woke" white women are a curse on Western civilization [6]. Group 2: Comments on MacKenzie Scott - Musk agreed with a user's comment that billionaire leftist wives pose a significant threat to Western civilization, labeling MacKenzie Scott as an example who despises her ex-husband and wishes harm upon individuals like him [8]. - He linked to an article discussing how Scott has donated a significant portion of her charitable contributions to organizations that support "immigrant criminals and transgender athletes" [8]. Group 3: Previous Criticisms of Scott - This is not the first time Musk has criticized Scott; in March 2024, he condemned her for donating $16.5 billion primarily to non-profits involved in racial and gender discrimination issues, stating that "hating your ex-husband's super-rich ex-wife" should be considered one of the reasons for the decline of Western civilization [11]. - In October 2024, Musk referred to Scott as "the face of the collapse of Western civilization" in another post [11].