Donovan Jones is an IPO research specialist with 15 years of experience analyzing investment opportunities for U.S. IPOs.He also leads the investing group IPO Edge, which offers actionable information on growth stocks through first-look IPO filings, previews on upcoming IPOs, an IPO calendar for tracking what’s on the horizon, a database of U.S. IPOs, and a guide to IPO investing to walk you through the entire IPO lifecycle - from filing to listing to quiet period and lockup expiration dates. Learn moreAnal ...

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of native AI models, exemplified by Anthropic's new automation tools, poses a significant threat to traditional software companies, raising questions about the sustainability of their business models and competitive advantages [2][3]. Group 1: Impact of Anthropic's Tools - Anthropic's release of a legal tool plugin for its Claude Cowork platform has triggered panic selling in the software sector, particularly affecting legal software and data service companies [2]. - Major companies like Thomson Reuters and LegalZoom saw their stock prices plummet by 21% and over 20% respectively, as their core business models were directly challenged by the cost-effective and integrated solutions offered by AI [3]. - The market fears that if companies can use a single AI plugin to handle legal compliance tasks that previously required multiple expensive software subscriptions, the subscription value of traditional SaaS companies will be severely undermined [3]. Group 2: Subscription Model Crisis - The term "SaaSpocalypse" reflects the growing concern that AI advancements may not just assist growth but could potentially replace traditional subscription models entirely [5]. - The traditional software industry's reliance on high-margin recurring revenue from seat-based billing is threatened as AI agents can perform tasks that previously required multiple personnel [5]. - This shift in expectations regarding future growth is a key driver behind the current wave of panic selling in the software sector [5]. Group 3: Performance Discrepancies - Among S&P 500 software stocks, only 69% reported revenues above expectations, significantly lower than the tech sector's overall 85% success rate, indicating a weak position in the AI-driven market [6]. - Even strong performers like Microsoft are under scrutiny as their Azure cloud business shows signs of slowing growth, leading to a decline in stock price over four consecutive trading days [6]. - In contrast, Palantir emerged as a rare "safe haven" with a 70% revenue increase in Q4, suggesting that the market is selectively favoring companies that can effectively leverage AI to enhance productivity [6]. Group 4: Market Reallocation - Despite the Nasdaq's poor performance, the S&P 500 shows a "seesaw" effect, with companies like FedEx and Walmart gaining market value, indicating a shift of funds from vulnerable software stocks to more defensively positioned sectors [7]. - The selling pressure on software stocks is characterized by a "surrender" mentality among investors, who are eager to exit positions regardless of price [7]. - From an investment perspective, extreme panic often creates opportunities, as evidenced by Microsoft's valuation dropping to a three-year low with a forward P/E ratio around 25 [7]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The year 2026 is anticipated to be a pivotal moment for the software industry, as AI programming and automation lower development barriers and diminish traditional business moats [8]. - The consensus on Wall Street has shifted fundamentally, with software no longer seen as a guaranteed profit generator in the face of competition from companies like Anthropic that possess foundational AI models [8]. - Investors are advised to focus on identifying companies with core competencies that are not easily replaceable by automation, rather than blindly attempting to catch falling stocks [8].

NEW YORK, Feb. 04, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important March 23, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased BellRing securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Ramaco Resources, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period, indicating potential legal issues surrounding the company's disclosures and operations [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to securities purchased between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025, and a lead plaintiff must file by March 31, 2026 [1][3]. - Investors who purchased Ramaco securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against Ramaco Resources - The lawsuit claims that Ramaco made materially false and misleading statements regarding its mining activities at the Brook Mine, including the lack of significant mining activity and overstated development progress [5]. - The allegations suggest that the positive statements made by Ramaco about its business and operations were misleading and lacked a reasonable basis, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked highly for settlements since 2013 [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in representing investor interests effectively [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued by the company [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - New Era Energy & Digital's stock fell 6.9% on December 12, 2025, following a report from Fuzzy Panda Research that accused the company of spending 2.5 times more on stock promotions than on operating its oil and gas wells [3]. - The report also highlighted the CEO E. Will Gray II's history of mismanaging penny stock companies over approximately 20 years [3]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Investor Rights - Investors who purchased New Era Energy & Digital securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action lawsuit, with no out-of-pocket fees due to a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action to seek recovery of investor losses and encourages affected investors to join [2]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of CoreWeave, Inc. securities from March 28, 2025, to December 15, 2025, about the lead plaintiff deadline on March 13, 2026 [1] - Investors who purchased CoreWeave securities during the specified period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has been filed against CoreWeave, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6] Case Details - The lawsuit alleges that CoreWeave's defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the company's ability to meet customer demand and the risks associated with reliance on a single third-party data center supplier [5] - It is claimed that these misrepresentations were likely to have a material negative impact on CoreWeave's revenue, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5] Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4] - The firm has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Bath & Body Works, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on March 16, 2026, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Bath & Body Works securities between June 4, 2024, and November 19, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the law firm or visiting their website [3][6]. - To serve as lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the Court by March 16, 2026, representing other class members in the litigation [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019, and has been recognized as a leader in the field of securities class action litigation [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Bath & Body Works made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business strategy and financial performance, which misled investors [5]. - Specific claims include the failure of the company's strategy to grow its customer base and the reliance on brand collaborations to mask weak financial results [5]. - As a result of these misleading statements, the company was unlikely to meet its previously issued financial guidance, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5].

NEW YORK, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Beyond Meat, Inc. (NASDAQ: BYND) between February 27, 2025 and November 11, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 24, 2026. SO WHAT: If you purchased Beyond Meat securities during the Class Perio ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Bellring Brands, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Bellring securities between November 19, 2024, and August 4, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 23, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4]. Group 3: Case Background - Bellring Brands develops and sells "convenient nutrition" products, primarily under the Premier Protein brand [5]. - During the Class Period, Bellring's management claimed that sales growth was due to increased consumer demand and downplayed competitive pressures, asserting a strong market position [5]. - Allegations suggest that reported sales were artificially inflated due to inventory stockpiling by key customers, rather than genuine consumer demand, leading to significant investor losses when the truth emerged [5].

NEW YORK, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS) common stock between February 4, 2025 and October 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important March 9, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Varonis common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency ...