Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased BellRing Brands, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the BellRing Brands, Inc. securities is from November 19, 2024, to August 4, 2025 [1] - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 23, 2026 [2] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Background - BellRing Brands develops and sells "convenient nutrition" products, primarily under the Premier Protein brand [4] - During the Class Period, BellRing's management claimed that sales growth was due to increased consumer demand and other positive factors, while downplaying competitive pressures [4] - The lawsuit alleges that actual sales were driven by inventory stockpiling by key customers, not by genuine consumer demand, leading to damages for investors when the truth was revealed [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of ordinary shares of uniQure N.V. for the period between September 24, 2025, and October 31, 2025, due to alleged misrepresentations regarding the company's drug candidate and its regulatory approval status [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that uniQure misrepresented the approval status of its Pivotal Study by the FDA and downplayed the likelihood of delays in its Biologics License Application (BLA) timeline, which led to investors suffering damages when the true information became public [5]. - Investors who purchased uniQure shares during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Participation Information - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact Phillip Kim, Esq. for more information. A lead plaintiff must file a motion by April 13, 2026 [3][6]. - It is noted that no class has been certified yet, and investors are not represented by counsel unless they retain one [7].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Beyond Meat, Inc. securities of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company during the specified Class Period [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the lawsuit is from February 27, 2025, to November 11, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors who purchased Beyond Meat securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 24, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Beyond Meat - The lawsuit alleges that Beyond Meat made materially false and misleading statements regarding the book value of certain long-lived assets, which exceeded their fair value, indicating a likely need for a material, non-cash impairment charge [5]. - It is claimed that these misstatements could impair Beyond Meat's ability to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission in a timely manner [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that when the true details became known, investors suffered damages due to the misleading public statements made by the defendants [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, highlighting the firm's expertise in this area [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Plug Power Inc. securities between January 17, 2025, and November 13, 2025, of the April 3, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Plug Power securities during the specified class period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - To serve as a lead plaintiff, individuals must file a motion with the court by April 3, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the availability of funds from the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan and the construction of hydrogen production facilities by Plug Power [5]. - It is claimed that these misrepresentations led to a pivot towards less commercially viable projects, making public statements materially false and misleading [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4].

Core Insights - CS Disco is currently valued at approximately 1x ARR, a significant decline from its previous valuation of nearly 20x ARR in 2021, reflecting a broader trend in the B2B SaaS market where companies are facing severe valuation compressions due to decelerating growth and leadership instability [2][7][12]. Company Overview - CS Disco is a legal tech company specializing in cloud-native eDiscovery software, operating in a market valued at over $15 billion [4]. - The company went public in July 2021 at $32 per share, initially seeing a market cap of $2.25 billion when it reached $120 million in ARR with a growth rate of 67% [4][6]. Financial Performance - As of Q3 2025, CS Disco has a market cap of around $250 million, with approximately $110 million in cash and no debt, leading to an enterprise value of about $140 million against $155 million in revenue [6][8]. - Revenue growth has sharply declined from 67% in 2021 to 18% in 2022, and is nearly flat in 2023, with projections of only 5% growth in 2024 and a potential re-acceleration to 10% in 2025 [9][14]. Leadership and Governance - The resignation of co-founder and CEO Kiwi Camara in 2023 amid misconduct allegations has contributed to a loss of trust among investors, further impacting the company's valuation [9][12]. Market Dynamics - The current valuation of CS Disco reflects a market sentiment that prioritizes cash on the balance sheet over revenue, indicating a lack of confidence in future growth prospects [8][12]. - The company faces competition from well-funded AI-native startups like Harvey and Legora, which are growing rapidly and commanding high valuations, further pressuring CS Disco's market position [15][42]. Growth and Profitability - Despite challenges, CS Disco has shown signs of improvement under new CEO Eric Friedrichsen, with software revenue growing 17% year-over-year in Q3 2025 [11][14]. - The company has a solid balance sheet with $113.5 million in cash and zero debt, providing a runway of over seven years at current burn rates [14]. Competitive Landscape - CS Disco's current valuation contrasts sharply with competitors like Harvey, which recently raised funds at an $11 billion valuation, and Legora, valued at $1.8 billion, despite CS Disco having higher revenue [37][39]. - The market is increasingly favoring companies with high growth rates, as evidenced by Harvey's rapid ascent from $10 million to over $100 million in ARR within two years, while CS Disco's growth has stagnated [42]. Industry Outlook - The legal AI market is experiencing significant investment and growth, with companies like Filevine demonstrating the potential for rapid revenue increases driven by AI capabilities [29][33]. - The disparity in valuations between established players like CS Disco and emerging startups suggests a potential arbitrage opportunity for investors, as the market reassesses the value of pre-AI SaaS companies [46][47].

NEW YORK, Feb. 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Klarna Group plc (NYSE: KLAR) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with Klarna’s September 2025 initial public offering (the “IPO”), of the important February 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action first filed by the Firm. SO WHAT: If you pur ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Plug Power Inc. securities during the specified Class Period, indicating potential legal issues surrounding the company's disclosures and financial statements [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is for purchasers of Plug Power securities between January 17, 2025, and November 13, 2025 [1]. - Investors who purchased securities during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by April 3, 2026, to represent other class members in the litigation [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Plug Power - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the availability of funds from the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan and the construction of hydrogen production facilities [5]. - It is claimed that Plug Power was likely to pivot towards less ambitious projects with lower commercial potential, contradicting earlier public statements [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that these misleading statements resulted in investor damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing investor rights [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Phoenix Education Partners, Inc. due to allegations of materially misleading business information issued to the public [1]. Group 1: Legal Action and Investor Rights - Shareholders who purchased Phoenix Education securities may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement, with no out-of-pocket costs [2]. - Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action to seek recovery of investor losses [2]. Group 2: Data Breach Incident - A significant data breach at the University of Phoenix has affected nearly 3.5 million individuals, with the breach traced back to August 2025 when attackers accessed sensitive information [3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [3].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Picard Medical, Inc. for the period between September 2, 2025, and October 31, 2025, due to alleged misleading statements and undisclosed material facts regarding the company's operations and securities trading [1]. Summary by Sections Class Action Announcement - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Picard Medical, Inc. for securities purchased during the specified Class Period [1]. - Investors wishing to serve as lead plaintiffs must file with the Court by April 13, 2026 [1][3]. Compensation Information - Investors who purchased Picard Medical securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Legal Representation - To join the class action, investors can visit the provided link or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - Investors have the option to select their own counsel or remain absent from the class at this stage [7]. Details of the Case - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made materially false and misleading statements and failed to disclose adverse facts about Picard's business and operations [5]. - Specific allegations include involvement in a fraudulent stock promotion scheme, insider trading through offshore accounts, and omission of critical information regarding stock price manipulation [5]. Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements and has a history of representing investors globally [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased common stock of Varonis Systems, Inc. during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Varonis common stock between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6]. - The deadline to move the court to serve as lead plaintiff is March 9, 2026 [3]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that Varonis made materially false and misleading statements regarding its ability to maintain Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) projections while transitioning customers to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model [5]. - It is claimed that Varonis was not adequately prepared to convince existing users of the benefits of the SaaS offering, leading to reduced ARR growth potential [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that the misleading statements about Varonis' business and prospects resulted in investor damages when the truth was revealed [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been recognized as a leader in the field [4].