受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我 2026年2月9日，上海久诚律师事务所许峰律师代理的海越能源（600387）投资者索赔案再收到赔偿款， 投资者调解获赔，律师团队同步还在继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受其他投资者的索赔委 托。 许峰律师提示，海越能源退市不影响投资者起诉，此前也已有部分投资者的案件收到民事调解书，部分 投资者调解获赔。（许峰律师专栏） 2025年4月16日，海越能源公告收到证监会《行政处罚决定书》。经查明，当事人存在以下违法事实： 1、海越能源未按规定披露控股股东非经营性资金占用 案涉期间，铜川汇能鑫能源有限公司（以下简称汇能鑫）持有海越能源19.21%的股份，高鑫金控持有 汇能鑫100%的股份。汇能鑫仅是高鑫金控用于管理控制海越能源的持股平台，相关事务由高鑫金控管 控，在经营管理、财务管理、人员管理、行政管理、办公场所等方面无独立性。案涉期间高鑫金控实际 管控海越能源，是海越能源控股股东。 2021年至202 ...

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我 2026年1月30日，上海久诚律师事务所股票索赔许峰律师代理的海越能源（600387）投资者索赔案再收 到赔偿款，投资者调解获赔，律师团队同步还在继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受其他投资 者的索赔委托。此前已有部分案件收到民事调解书，部分投资者调解获赔。（许峰律师专栏） 2025年4月16日，海越能源公告收到证监会《行政处罚决定书》。经查明，当事人存在以下违法事实： 1、海越能源未按规定披露控股股东非经营性资金占用 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我 案涉期间，铜川汇能鑫能源有限公司（以下简称汇能鑫）持有海越能源19.21%的股份，高鑫金控持有 汇能鑫100%的股份。汇能鑫仅是高鑫金控用于管理控制海越能源的持股平台，相关 ...

2020-2025年中国原油产量统计图 上市企业：中国石油（601857）,中国石化（600028）,大庆华科（000985）,广汇能源（600256）,潜能恒 信（300191）,ST海越（600387） 相关报告：智研咨询发布的《2026-2032年中国石油行业发展策略分析及投资前景研究报告》 根据国家统计局数据显示：2025年12月中国原油产量为1780万吨，同比下降0.6%；2025年中国原油累 计产量为21604.7万吨，累计增长1.5%。 数据来源：国家统计局，智研咨询整理 知前沿，问智研。智研咨询是中国一流产业咨询机构，十数年持续深耕产业研究领域，提供深度产业研 究报告、商业计划书、可行性研究报告及定制服务等一站式产业咨询服务。专业的角度、品质化的服 务、敏锐的市场洞察力，专注于提供完善的产业解决方案，为您的投资决策赋能。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing scrutiny and enforcement actions by regulatory bodies in China against financial fraud in publicly listed companies, highlighting a significant rise in the number of cases and the decline in the amount of inflated revenue reported by these companies [1][2]. Regulatory Actions - Since July 2024, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has handled 159 financial fraud cases, resulting in 111 administrative penalties totaling 8.1 billion yuan [2]. - The regulatory framework has been strengthened to include criminal referrals and civil claims against third parties involved in financial fraud, ensuring a comprehensive accountability system [1][2]. Trends in Financial Fraud - In 2025, approximately 43 companies were penalized for inflating revenue, with a total inflated revenue of about 15 billion yuan, a significant decrease from over 600 billion yuan in 2024 [2][3]. - The number of companies involved in financial fraud is increasing, but the total amount of inflated revenue has decreased significantly, indicating a potential improvement in compliance [2][3]. Common Fraud Techniques - Common methods of financial fraud include fictitious business operations, premature revenue recognition, and transactions with related parties lacking commercial substance [3][4]. - Companies have also been found to underreport costs and expenses to inflate profits, with some instances of fraud lasting several years before detection [3][4]. Case Studies of Fraudulent Companies - Notable cases include: - Evergrande Group, which inflated revenue by over 560 billion yuan [3]. - ST Huawen, which inflated revenue by 3.62 billion yuan through improper accounting practices [4][5]. - ST Chuangyi, which inflated revenue by 3.93 billion yuan by misreporting income from sales [6][7]. - ST Meichen, which inflated revenue by 14.39 billion yuan over five years through fraudulent procurement practices [13][14]. Impact of Regulatory Actions - The regulatory crackdown has led to the delisting of several companies, including ST Meichen and ST Huawen, due to severe financial misconduct [12][21]. - The enforcement actions have resulted in a more stringent environment for financial reporting, with companies facing significant penalties and reputational damage for non-compliance [2][20].

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 31，292万元，占公司当期净资产的比例分别为12.5%、9.47%；2022年发生额68，800万元，余额35， 543万元，占公司当期净资产的比例分别为20.67%、10.68%。截至2023年4月30日，案涉占用资金已全 部归还。 上述情况，海越能源未按规定及时披露，亦未在2021年半年度报告、2021年年度报告、2022年半年度报 告中披露，在2022年年度报告中部分披露，但未真实、准确、完整披露。 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 上海久诚律师事务所股票索赔律师许峰代理的海越能源（600387）虚假陈述投资者索赔案再出现进展， 2025年12月16日，许峰律师代理的海越能源投资者索赔案再收到绍兴中院调解书，投资者调解获赔。 （许峰律师专栏） 律师团队同步还在继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受其他投资者的索赔委托。此前已有部分 案件收到民事调解书，部分投资者调解获赔，部分案件已经收到赔偿款项。 2025年4月16日， ...

Core Viewpoint - The news discusses ongoing investor compensation cases involving Haiyue Energy and Ningke Biological, highlighting legal actions taken due to financial misconduct and false reporting by these companies [1][3]. Group 1: Haiyue Energy (600387) - Haiyue Energy has been involved in a compensation case where investors have received settlements through mediation, with ongoing efforts to accept more claims [1][2]. - The company was penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for failing to disclose non-operating fund occupation by its controlling shareholder, which was not reported in several financial statements [1][2]. - A significant accounting error was identified, where Haiyue Energy incorrectly used the total amount method to recognize revenue, leading to an inflated revenue and cost figure of 302,081.64 million yuan, which represented 49.33% and 50.51% of the reported figures respectively [2][8]. Group 2: Ningke Biological (600165) - Ningke Biological's investor compensation case has also progressed, with a court ruling in favor of investors, and the legal team is accepting more claims [3][9]. - The company was found to have falsely reported its 2022 annual revenue, inflating it by 7,659.41 million yuan, which accounted for 11.25% of the total revenue, and profit by 7,722.20 million yuan, representing 46.59% of the total profit [9][10]. - The company failed to timely disclose significant events, including major debts, frozen bank accounts, and the suspension of key subsidiary operations [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses ongoing legal actions against Yangzi New Materials and Haiyue Energy for false statements and significant omissions in their financial disclosures, highlighting potential compensation opportunities for affected investors [1][3][4]. Group 1: Yangzi New Materials - Yangzi New Materials is facing legal claims from investors due to false statements and significant omissions in its annual reports, particularly regarding related party transactions and financial misreporting [1][3]. - The company failed to disclose substantial related party fund occupation, with amounts reaching approximately 197.65 million yuan in 2018 and 363.31 million yuan in 2019 [1]. - In 2020, Yangzi New Materials inflated its revenue by approximately 137.10 million yuan, accounting for about 11% of its reported revenue for that year [3]. Group 2: Haiyue Energy - Haiyue Energy is also under scrutiny for failing to disclose non-operating fund occupation by its controlling shareholder and for misreporting its financial results [4][5]. - The company acknowledged accounting errors that led to an overstatement of revenue and costs by approximately 302.08 million yuan in its 2022 semi-annual report, which represented 49.33% of its reported revenue [5]. - Legal actions are being pursued for investors who bought Haiyue Energy shares during specific periods, with opportunities for compensation still available [6].

Group 1 - The law firm led by Xie Baoping has successfully obtained compensation for investors in multiple securities fraud cases, including Guangzhou Langqi and Tongzhou Electronics [1][2][3] - On September 1, 2025, investors in 000523 Guangzhou Langqi received compensation from a lawsuit against Guangzhou Hongmian Zhihui Technology Co., Ltd. [1] - On September 16, 2025, investors in 002052 Tongzhou Electronics received compensation from a lawsuit against Shenzhen Tongzhou Electronics Co., Ltd. [1] Group 2 - The law firm has received various court rulings and mediation agreements, indicating ongoing legal proceedings in multiple cases [2] - On September 2, 2025, a civil judgment was received for investors in 000796 Caesar Travel, with compensation expected soon [2] - On September 3, 2025, a second-instance judgment confirmed compensation for investors in 002052 Tongzhou Electronics [2] Group 3 - The law firm has been actively filing new cases against several companies for securities fraud [7][8][9] - On September 1, 2025, multiple cases were filed against companies including Shenzhen Derun Electronics and Zhejiang Dongni Electronics [7] - A total of 88 new cases were filed by the law firm in September 2025, indicating a significant increase in legal actions against companies for securities fraud [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The report by Zhiyan Consulting highlights the growth trends in China's oil industry, with specific data on production levels and projections for the future [1]. Group 1: Industry Overview - As of August 2025, China's crude oil production reached 18.26 million tons, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 2.4% [1]. - Cumulatively, from January to August 2025, China's total crude oil production amounted to 144.858 million tons, showing a cumulative growth of 1.4% [1]. Group 2: Companies Involved - Listed companies in the oil sector include China National Petroleum Corporation (601857), China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (600028), Daqing Huake (000985), Guanghui Energy (600256), Qianeng Huanxin (300191), and ST Haiyue (600387) [1]. Group 3: Research and Consulting - Zhiyan Consulting is recognized as a leading industry consulting firm in China, providing comprehensive industry research reports, business plans, feasibility studies, and customized services [1].

Core Viewpoint - Haiyue Energy Group Co., Ltd. was fined 685,500 yuan for issuing false VAT invoices or invoices used to fraudulently claim export tax refunds and tax deductions [1][2]. Group 1: Company Violations - The company was found to have issued 160 false VAT invoices totaling 1,560.46 million yuan, with a tax amount of 265.278 million yuan [1][2]. - Additionally, the company issued 18 false VAT invoices for others (for itself) that also did not match actual business operations, amounting to 1,560.46 million yuan and a tax amount of 265.278 million yuan [1][2]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Actions - The administrative penalty of 685,500 yuan was imposed based on the "Tax Collection and Administration Law of the People's Republic of China" and other relevant laws and regulations [1][2]. - The company has been listed as a major tax violation and dishonest entity by the Credit China platform [3].