Investment Rating - The report maintains a positive long-term outlook for the insurance sector, indicating a strong continuity in market performance despite recent fluctuations [2][12][16]. Core Insights - The financial sector experienced a mixed performance this week, with the non-bank financial index down by 1.45%, underperforming the CSI 300 index by 0.83 percentage points. The insurance sector saw a decline of 4.02%, while the brokerage sector decreased by 0.61% [1][10]. - The insurance sector's performance is driven by two main factors: policy support leading to economic recovery and liquidity easing combined with a strong stock market. The report suggests a shift from liquidity-driven growth to a focus on macro policy support and economic recovery expectations [2][13][16]. - The brokerage sector is expected to benefit from new regulations that enhance investment management quality, with a recommendation to focus on larger, undervalued firms and those involved in mergers and acquisitions [3][18]. - The banking sector is facing a slight decline, but there are signs of recovery in profitability for leading banks, with recommendations to focus on banks with high dividend yields and those expected to benefit from market conditions [19][21]. Summary by Sections Insurance Sector - The insurance sector's recent decline is attributed to short-term market sentiment and liquidity changes, but the long-term outlook remains positive due to strong support from both the liability and asset sides [2][12][16]. - Key recommendations include focusing on companies like China Pacific Insurance, China Ping An, China Life (H), and China Taiping, with a specific recommendation for New China Life [4][16]. Brokerage Sector - The brokerage sector's performance is slightly better than the overall market, with a focus on the new guidelines from the regulatory body that aim to improve fund management quality [3][17]. - Recommended firms include Guotai Junan, Huatai Securities, and others, particularly those with strong merger and acquisition prospects [4][18]. Banking Sector - The banking sector has shown a decline but is expected to stabilize, with recommendations to focus on banks with high earnings elasticity and strong dividend yields [19][21]. - Specific banks to watch include Hangzhou Bank, Ningbo Bank, and others, with a focus on those that have previously been undervalued [4][21].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing trend of personal non-performing loan (NPL) transfers in the banking sector, driven by regulatory changes and the rising pressure of bad debts on financial institutions [1][5]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The personal NPL transfer market is experiencing a surge, with transaction volumes rising from 186.48 billion in 2021 to 965.30 billion in 2023, and projected to reach 1583.50 billion in 2024 [3][4]. - As of January 22, 2026, there were 20 new announcements for personal NPL transfers within the month, indicating heightened activity in the market [2][8]. - The average discount rate for personal NPL packages has significantly decreased, with rates dropping from 8%-10% before 2023 to around 5% in 2026 [10][11]. Group 2: Regulatory Impact - A regulatory notification extended the trial period for bulk transfers of personal NPLs until December 31, 2026, allowing a wider range of financial institutions to participate in the transfer process [2][4]. - The expansion of trial institutions to include city commercial banks and rural commercial banks has led to a notable increase in the volume of NPL transfers [5][17]. Group 3: Borrower Profile and Economic Context - The borrower demographic for personal NPLs includes failed entrepreneurs, unemployed individuals relying on credit cards for living expenses, and consumers with excessive debt [4][20]. - The economic backdrop, characterized by macroeconomic fluctuations and income instability, has exacerbated the bad debt situation, compelling banks to offload risk assets [5][20]. Group 4: Challenges in Asset Recovery - The recovery rates for NPLs have declined, with some packages facing average recovery rates below 6%, marking the lowest in five years [12][13]. - Financial institutions are facing challenges in asset valuation and recovery due to incomplete documentation and inefficient legal processes [26][28]. Group 5: Strategic Adjustments - Banks are adapting their strategies by improving the quality of NPL packages, such as reducing overdue times and increasing the concentration of borrowers in economically developed areas [24][25]. - There is a push for enhanced transparency and standardization in the NPL transfer process to improve market confidence and asset pricing [28].

近日，重庆银行为位于川渝交界处的重庆市开州区大进镇、四川省宣汉县漆树土家族乡的两家经营主体 合计发放了120万元的GEP质押贷款，这是川渝地区首笔跨省域GEP质押贷款，迈出了从生态价值核算 到信用融资"两山"转化的关键一步。 大进镇和漆树土家族乡地处秦巴山区腹地，生态资源丰富。去年 底，开州区与宣汉县共建的川渝雪巴画廊绿色生态屏障统筹发展先行区获评"绿水青山就是金山银山"实 践创新基地，大进镇和漆树土家族乡则是该先行区的核心区域之一。 业内人士认为，GEP质押融资金 融创新，将生态效益转化为可度量、可质押的金融资产，为缺乏传统抵押物的绿色产业主体开辟了新的 融资渠道，将有效激励生态保护者，促进生态保护与经济发展良性互动。（四川日报） ...

股票研究 /[Table_Date] 2026.01.23 票 研 究 主动基金环比持平，被动基金增持 [Table_Industry] 商业银行 | [姓名table_Authors] | 电话 | 邮箱 | 登记编号 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 马婷婷(分析师) | 021-23185608 | matingting@gtht.com | S0880525100001 | | 陈惠琴(分析师) | 021-38676666 | chenhuiqin@gtht.com | S0880525100003 | 本报告导读： 25Q4 主动基金对银行持仓比例环比持平于 1.9%，被动基金持仓比例环比+1.6pct 至 7.0%，其中宁波银行、兴业银行、中国银行、建设银行等获主动基金增配。 25Q4 基金对银行持仓点评 投资要点： [Table_Summary] 2025 年四季度基金重仓持股情况披露（主动基金包括普通股票型、 偏股混合型、灵活配置型，被动基金包括被动指数型、指数增强型）： [Table_Report] 相关报告 商业银行《国有大行投放力度较大，不良压力或 企稳》20 ...

证券之星消息，1月23日城商行板块较上一交易日下跌1.01%，上海银行领跌。当日上证指数报收于 4136.16，上涨0.33%。深证成指报收于14439.66，上涨0.79%。城商行板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 收盘价 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量(手) | 成交额(元) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 002948 | 青岛银行 | 4.52 | 2.49% | 108.02万 | 4.86亿 | | 601963 | 重庆银行 | 10.44 | 1.75% | 13.53万 | 1.41亿 | | 600928 | 西安银行 | 3.69 | 0.54% | 22.19万 | 8174.14万 | | 601997 | 豊阳银行 | 5.83 | 0.52% | 22.43万 | 1.31亿 | | 002936 | 郑州银行 | 1.91 | 0.00% | 88.24万 | 1.69亿 | | 001227 | 兰州银行 | 2.32 | 0.00% | 53.68万 | 1.25亿 | | 601577 | 长沙银行 | 9.37 | ...

Market Overview - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 0.55% on January 21, with Chongqing Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4116.94, up 0.08%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14255.12, up 0.7% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Ningbo Bank closed at 28.88, with an increase of 1.16% and a trading volume of 432,300 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 1.246 billion [1] - Chongqing Bank closed at 10.25, down 1.82%, with a trading volume of 106,800 shares and a transaction value of 110 million [2] - Other notable performers include Xiamen Bank, which closed at 7.13, down 1.66%, and Chengdu Bank, which closed at 15.72, down 1.38% [2] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 508 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 566 million [2] - The capital flow for individual stocks indicates that Hangzhou Bank had a net inflow of 158 million from institutional investors, while it faced a net outflow of 86.5 million from retail investors [3] - Shanghai Bank also saw a net inflow of 107 million from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 121 million from retail investors [3]

每经AI快讯，1月21日午后，银行板块持续调整，农业银行跌近3%，工商银行、中信银行、浦发银行、 重庆银行、邮储银行等跌幅靠前。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） ...

Market Overview - Major Asia-Pacific indices showed a collective decline, with the A-share market also experiencing consolidation, as the Shanghai Composite Index fluctuated while the Shenzhen Component and ChiNext indices performed weakly. The total trading volume in Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing reached 2.8 trillion yuan, an increase of 72 billion yuan compared to the previous day [1] Real Estate Sector - The real estate sector rebounded strongly, with a notable increase in the price of a real estate ETF (159707) by 3.22%, marking multiple consecutive gains. According to the National Bureau of Statistics, the sales price of newly built commercial residential properties in first-tier cities decreased by 0.3% month-on-month in December 2025, with Shanghai seeing a slight increase of 0.2% [1] Chemical Sector - The chemical sector experienced a significant rally, with the chemical ETF (516020) reaching a new high since August 2022, closing up 1.27%. Major companies in the sector, such as BASF and Dow, have been raising prices across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The ETF attracted 1.148 billion yuan in the last ten days [1][4] - The chemical ETF has seen substantial net inflows, with over 5.8 billion yuan in net subscriptions in the last five trading days and 11 billion yuan in the last ten days. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has set guidelines for zero-carbon factory construction, which may limit new capacity in the chemical sector [6][7] Banking Sector - The banking sector showed resilience amid market volatility, with a significant number of bank stocks rising. The top bank ETF (512800) closed up 0.77%, ending a four-day losing streak. Historical data indicates that the banking sector has a high probability of generating absolute and excess returns before the Spring Festival, with an average return of 4.4% from 2017 to 2025 [8][11][14] - The banking sector is expected to benefit from continued growth in credit, supported by stable growth policies and a favorable low-interest-rate environment. The latest dividend yield for the banking index stands at 4.78%, significantly higher than the 10-year government bond yield of 1.84% [14][15] AI and Technology Sector - The AI and technology sectors faced a downturn, with the entrepreneurial AI ETF (159363) experiencing a four-day decline. Despite this, the sector remains attractive for future investments, particularly in light of ongoing developments in AI applications and infrastructure [16][18] - The communication and semiconductor industries are expected to see increased attention due to their potential for earnings upgrades, with significant growth anticipated in the coming years [18][20]

Core Insights - The city commercial bank sector experienced a rise of 1.35% on January 20, with Chengdu Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4113.65, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 14155.63, down 0.97% [1] Stock Performance - Chengdu Bank (601838) closed at 15.94, up 3.10% with a trading volume of 606,000 shares and a transaction value of 9.56 billion [1] - Chongqing Bank (601963) closed at 10.44, up 2.96% with a trading volume of 133,800 shares and a transaction value of 138 million [1] - Other notable performers include: - Changsha Bank (601577): closed at 9.36, up 2.41% [1] - Qilu Bank (601665): closed at 5.48, up 2.05% [1] - Beijing Bank (601169): closed at 5.32, up 1.92% [1] - Qingdao Bank (002948): closed at 4.30, up 1.90% [1] - Xiamen Bank (601187): closed at 7.25, up 1.54% [1] - Shanghai Bank (601229): closed at 9.79, up 1.35% [1] - Nanjing Bank (601009): closed at 10.56, up 1.34% [1] - Hangzhou Bank (600926): closed at 15.24, up 1.20% [1] Capital Flow - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 266 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 42.84 million [1] - Detailed capital flow for selected banks includes: - Shanghai Bank (601229): net inflow of 1.051 billion from institutional investors, with net outflows from retail and speculative investors [2] - Hangzhou Bank (600926): net inflow of 90.48 million from institutional investors, with significant outflows from retail and speculative investors [2] - Nanjing Bank (601009): net inflow of 26.57 million from institutional investors, with outflows from retail investors [2] - Other banks also showed varying levels of net inflows and outflows [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report from Guotai Junan predicts that the revenue and net profit growth rate for listed banks in 2025 will be 1.5% and 2.2% respectively, benefiting from stable interest margins and declining credit costs [1][2] Revenue and Profit Forecast - The expected revenue and net profit growth rates for the sample banks (26 listed banks) in 2025 are 1.5% and 2.2%, which represent an increase of 0.3 percentage points compared to the first three quarters of 2025 [2] - The net interest income growth is projected to turn positive, with an expected annual growth rate of 0.3%, improving from a negative growth of -0.6% in the first three quarters of 2025 [1][2] Asset Growth - For Q4 2025, the growth rates of interest-earning assets and loans are expected to be 9.04% and 8.07% respectively, showing a slight decline from Q3 2025 [2] - By the end of December 2025, the growth rates for loans and bond investments are projected to be 6.9% and 16.4%, respectively, both lower than the end of September 2025 [2] Interest Margin - The interest margin for 2025 is expected to stabilize at 1.40%, with the net interest income growth projected to improve to 0.3% for the year [2] - The stability in interest margin is attributed to the repricing of high-cost long-term deposits and a stable Loan Prime Rate (LPR) [2] Non-Interest Income - The growth rate for non-interest income is expected to be 4.8% in 2025, a decrease of 2.8 percentage points compared to the first three quarters of 2025 [3] - The attractiveness of dividend insurance products is expected to drive growth in fee income through the bancassurance channel [3] Asset Quality - The credit cost for 2025 is projected to be 0.58%, a decrease of 8 basis points compared to the first three quarters of 2025 [4] - The non-performing loan (NPL) ratio is expected to remain stable at 1.21%, with a slight decrease in the provision coverage ratio to 239.1% [4] Investment Recommendations - For 2026, the investment focus in the banking sector includes identifying banks with potential for growth, recommending Ningbo Bank, China Merchants Bank, and Nanjing Bank [4] - Emphasis on banks with convertible bond expectations, recommending Chongqing Bank and Changshu Bank [4] - Continuation of dividend strategies is anticipated, recommending Bank of Communications, Jiangsu Bank, and others [4]