Group 1: Stock Recommendations - 吉利汽车 (Geely Auto) has a market cap of $23.4 billion, with a target price of $25.00, indicating an upside potential of 48%[5] - 正力新能 (Zhengli New Energy) has a market cap of $2.8 billion, with a target price of $18.00, indicating an upside potential of 113%[5] - 极兔速递 (Jitu Express) has a market cap of $12.2 billion, with a target price of $13.40, indicating an upside potential of 25%[5] - 三一国际 (Sany International) has a market cap of $6.2 billion, with a target price of $20.60, indicating an upside potential of 37%[5] - 瑞幸咖啡 (Luckin Coffee) has a market cap of $11.0 billion, with a target price of $54.68, indicating an upside potential of 41%[5] Group 2: Performance Overview - The basket of 26 long positions had an average return of -2.3%, outperforming the MSCI China Index, which returned -2.4% by 0.1 percentage points[10] - Out of the 26 stocks, 11 had returns exceeding the benchmark[10] - The report includes a new addition of Datadog (DDOG US) to the buy list, while Salesforce (CRM US) has been removed[7]

新浪科技讯 2月23日晚间消息，携程平台最新数据显示，今年春节旅游市场呈现出显著的"深度 化"与"国际化"双重趋势。中国人不再满足于简单的回家团圆或景点打卡，而是追求更丰富的文化体验 和更灵活的双城漫游；同时，中国春节也正吸引着全球游客前来深度体验，逐步成为一个世界级的文化 IP。 携程数据显示，今年春节，北京、成都、上海、广州、深圳、哈尔滨、三亚、西安、重庆、福州、厦 门、武汉 等城市依旧是全国游客最喜爱的国内目的地。此外，一批具有独特风情和文化体验的小众目 的地成功突围：陕西延安订单量同比增长70%，山东泰安增长65%，云南普洱增长59%，新疆可克达 拉、海南文昌、广西崇左均实现56%以上增长，内蒙古呼和浩特、云南玉溪、新疆双河、江苏无锡增长 率均在48%以上。 以非遗为代表的文化体验成为最热门出行主题。在北方，传统年画技艺带动了古城旅游，天津订单量同 比增长29%，河南开封和郑州整体订单分别实现50%和27%的增长。在南方，灯会与非遗表演同样火 爆，安徽黄山订单同比上涨32%，四川自贡订单量同比增长20%。潮汕地区的英歌舞在这个春节"再破 圈"，广东汕头和潮州的订单量分别增涨36%和31%。同样因非遗而 ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Trip.com Group Limited due to allegations of materially misleading business information [1] Group 1: Investigation and Legal Action - Investors who purchased Trip.com Group securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action lawsuit without any out-of-pocket fees [2] - The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action to seek recovery of investor losses related to Trip.com [2] Group 2: Stock Performance and Regulatory Issues - Trip.com stock fell 17% on January 14, 2026, after the company disclosed it is under investigation by China's market regulator for potential antitrust violations [3] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4] - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors over the years [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Trip.com Group Limited due to allegations of materially misleading business information [1] Group 1: Investigation and Legal Action - Investors who purchased Trip.com Group securities may be entitled to compensation through a class action lawsuit without any out-of-pocket fees [2] - The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action to seek recovery of investor losses related to Trip.com [2] Group 2: Stock Performance and Regulatory Issues - Trip.com stock fell 17% on January 14, 2026, after the company disclosed it is under investigation by China's market regulator for potential antitrust violations [3] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4] - The firm has been ranked highly for its number of securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]

2026年1月14日，国家市场监督管理总局官网发布公告，依法对在线旅游（OTA）行业巨头携程集团涉 嫌滥用市场支配地位实施垄断行为立案调查，最终决定处罚其65亿元。此次舆情爆发前两日，携程市值 两日蒸发近千亿港元。 然而，比股价暴跌更值得关注的，是危机演进过程中的一个鲜明反差：一边是监管信号持续释放、商家 怨气长期累积、公众疑虑日渐加深；另一边是携程看似谦恭配合，实则回避核心、缺乏实质性自省 的"沉默式"回应。这种"垄断者的傲慢"与"公关的沉默"，最终共同点燃了这场必然的"爆雷"。 对于肩负特殊使命与社会责任的国有企业而言，携程的教训绝非隔岸观火。它如同一面棱镜，折射出在 复杂的市场与社会期待下，企业治理与舆情风险防控体系的深层命题。 携程的教训，对于国有企业而言，具有比一般民营企业更为深刻和紧迫的启示。国企不仅要在市场中具 有竞争力，而且肩负着政治、经济和社会多重责任，其公众期待更高，容错空间更小。因此，国企的舆 情风险治理，必须超越"公关技巧"层面，升维至"韧性治理"的战略高度。 启示一：建立"社会效益"与"经济效益"的双重评价基线。国企决不能陷入"唯规模论""唯利润论"的陷 阱。携程"带病盈利"的教训警 ...

Group 1 - The Nasdaq China Golden Dragon Index fell by over 1% on February 20 [2] - Bilibili experienced a decline of 4.72% [2] - Baidu's stock decreased by 4.22% [2] - Century Internet dropped by 4.10% [2] - Trip.com saw a decline of 3.96% [2] - Xpeng Motors fell by 2.79% [2]

Core Viewpoint - The stock prices of several companies, including Lufax Holdings, Wanwu Xingsheng, Noah Wealth, JinkoSolar, and Trip.com, have experienced declines, indicating a negative trend in the market for these firms [1] Company Performance - Lufax Holdings saw a decline of 3.28% in its stock price [1] - Wanwu Xingsheng's stock dropped by 2.99% [1] - Noah Wealth experienced a decrease of 2.68% [1] - JinkoSolar's stock fell by 2.41% [1] - Trip.com reported a decline of 2.26% [1]

（来源：千龙网） 近日，记者从携程旅行网获悉，春节假期西藏旅游热度明显升温，整体旅游订单量同比增长94%，机票 订单量同比增长99%。布达拉宫、纳木错扎西岛、大昭寺、八廓街、西藏博物馆位列西藏热门景区前 五。 从出行结构看，春节出游的"家庭属性"尤为突出，亲子家庭成为出行主力，相关预订单占比过半。2026 年春节假期被称为"史上最长春节假期"，携程旅行网分析认为，超长假期与亲子出游需求叠加，推动春 节出游由"短途集中"向"行程更分散、体验更深入"转变。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Financial Supervision Administration, in conjunction with the State Administration for Market Regulation and the People's Bank of China, has initiated special discussions with six major travel platforms regarding non-compliance in their credit business practices [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Six mainstream travel platforms, including Ctrip, Gaode Map, Tongcheng Travel, Fliggy, Hanglv Zhongyong, and Qunar, are involved in the discussions [1] - The core focus of the discussions is on issues related to non-standard credit business practices [1] Group 2: Identified Risks - The platforms are reported to have three main risks: misleading marketing, lack of information disclosure, and inadequate consumer protection mechanisms [1]

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities are accelerating the clarification of boundaries in the context of the deep integration of platform economy and financial services, focusing on the risks of misleading marketing, lack of information disclosure, and inadequate consumer protection in the "scene embedded lending" model [1][12]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - On February 13, the National Financial Supervision Administration, in conjunction with the State Administration for Market Regulation and the People's Bank of China, initiated special discussions with six major travel platforms regarding their lending practices [1]. - The discussions highlighted non-compliance issues in marketing behavior, information disclosure, and consumer rights protection among the involved companies [1]. - Regulatory requirements include the prohibition of misleading promotional language, clear disclosure of lending institutions and product information, and the establishment of effective customer complaint channels [1]. Group 2: Company-Specific Financial Practices - Ctrip has obtained multiple financial business qualifications since acquiring an insurance agency license in 2011, including commercial factoring, online micro-lending, and third-party payment services, and has expanded its financial licensing internationally [2]. - In contrast, Gaode Map does not hold any financial licenses and operates a pure referral model for lending services, with third-party financial institutions providing the actual loans [9]. - Tongcheng Travel has completed its licensing requirements by acquiring a payment company and consolidating its lending licenses, allowing it to collaborate with over 50 lending platforms [11]. Group 3: Regulatory Challenges - The coexistence of licensed self-operated platforms and unlicensed referral platforms presents a core challenge for current regulatory efforts [11]. - The regulatory focus for licensed platforms like Ctrip is on the potential misuse of information advantages, while for unlicensed platforms like Gaode, the emphasis is on avoiding substantial marketing under the guise of information display [11]. - The high-frequency and low-decision-cost nature of travel platforms can amplify the effects of credit inducement, leading to potential credit record impacts for users who do not fully understand the terms [11]. Group 4: Cross-Departmental Regulatory Mechanism - The joint action reflects a deepening of cross-departmental regulatory mechanisms, with each department focusing on different aspects of compliance and consumer protection [12]. - This initiative serves as a systemic brake on the financialization impulse of platform economies, emphasizing that technological convenience cannot replace compliance standards [12]. - The regulatory framework aims to ensure that platforms can connect to financial services while maintaining clear disclosures and protecting consumer decision-making rights [12].