证券研究报告|策略定期研究 2026年02月24日 QFII等主题右侧突破 ——主题形态学输出0222 证券分析师： 研究助理： 周浦寒 S0210524040007 杨逸帆 S0210124110046 请务必阅读报告末页的重要声明 华福证券 华福证券 投资要点 Ø 风险提示：历史经验不代表未来;行业不确定性风险;国内经济复苏速度不及预期;海外 降息节奏不及预期;地缘政治风险。 2 华福证券 华福证券 Ø 主题形态学，0222最新输出： l 1）右侧突破，新增：QFII，智谱AI。 l 2）右侧趋势，持续：光伏，POE胶膜，BC电池，靶材，电力物联网等。 l 3）底部企稳，持续：仿制药，智能物流，电动车，服务机器人，消费金融，白 酒，葡萄酒等。 l 4）底部反转，持续：六氟磷酸锂，锂电电解液，手机电池，白酒，品牌龙头。 录 n 主题形态学最新输出 n 风险提示 目 3 华福证券 华福证券 主题形态学的最新输出 4 华福证券 华福证券 l 1）右侧突破，新增：QFII，智谱AI。 l 2）右侧趋势，持续：光伏，POE胶膜，BC电池，靶材，电力物联网等。 l 3）底部企稳，持续：仿制药，智能物流，电动车，服务机 ...

证券研究报告|专题报告 金融工程 2026年2月24日 基于胜率与盈亏比的行业博弈策略 —— 概率驱动的行业轮动决策框架 证券分析师： 李杨 执业证书编号： S0210524100005 熊晓湛 执业证书编号： S0210524100006 请务必阅读报告末页的重要声明 华福证券 华福证券 投资要点 ➢ 概率思维 —将行业指数作为可重复博弈对象 我们将行业指数视为可重复参与的博弈对象，而非一次性的行情判断，以胜率 × 盈亏结构刻画行业在长期维度上的博弈价值。 在筛选阶段引入综合盈亏指标，对行业在不同市场环境中的成功概率与回报结构进行系统评估，优选具备正期望、能够穿越周期 的成功行业。 ➢ 逆周期筛选—选取历史上有成功经验的行业 在行业筛选过程中，不是仅依赖当期强弱做单期判断，而是对弱势行业引入历史排名记忆机制（参考其最近一次进入强势阶段时 的综合表现），并与当前强势行业统一比较。 该机制有助于在轮动与风格切换期间保留具备反转潜力的行业。 ➢ 应用凯利公式—进一步优化权重分配方案 Kelly 权重解决的是"在同一批入选行业中，资金该如何分配"。 在不改变行业筛选结果的前提下，基于各行业的胜率与盈亏结构进行差异化 ...

有色金属 2026 年 02 月 23 日 行 业 研 究 有色金属 20260223 周报：避险和滞涨交易仍是黄金交易的 核心，长期配置价值不改 投资要点： 行 业 定 期 报 告 贵金属：避险和滞涨交易仍是黄金交易的核心，长期配置价值不改。 美国一系列宏观经济数据发布，就业数据韧性及美联储官员一系列偏鹰派 言论削弱市场降息预期。市场主流对首次降息预期从此前6月延后至7月。 短期而言，美联储降息预期摇摆，整体呈现易涨难跌格局；中长期而言， 全球关税政策和地缘政治的不确定性背景下，避险和滞涨交易仍是黄金交 易的核心，长期配置价值不改。个股：1）黄金：关注招金灵宝万国紫金黄 金，A股关注紫金矿业、中金、赤峰及西金等；H股关注潼关、山金、招矿 及集海等。2）银铂钯：均为黄金的贝塔，个股关注盛达、湖银、豫光、贵 研及浩通等。 工业金属：降息预期博弈，工业金属预期震荡。铜，短期，美联储降 息预期仍在，基本面偏紧格局延续支撑铜价；中长期，随美联储降息加深 提振投资和消费，同时打开国内货币政策空间，叠加特朗普政府后续可能 宽财政带来的通胀反弹将支撑铜价中枢上移，新能源需求强劲将带动供需 缺口拉大，继续看好铜价。铝，短期， ...

Inflation Data - January CPI year-on-year growth decreased to 2.4%, below the market expectation of 2.5% and down from the previous value of 2.7%[2] - Core CPI also fell to 2.5%, down from 2.6%, marking the lowest level since April 2021[2] - Month-on-month, core CPI rose by 0.3%, in line with expectations, compared to a previous increase of 0.2%[2] Energy and Commodity Trends - Energy inflation dropped further, with January CPI energy component year-on-year growth at -0.1%, down from 2.3%[3] - Gasoline prices saw a year-on-year decline of -7.5%, contributing significantly to the overall energy inflation drop[3] - Core commodity inflation fell to 1.1% year-on-year, down from 1.4%, with used car prices plummeting to -2% year-on-year, a decline of 3.6 percentage points from the previous month[4] Service Inflation - Core service inflation decreased to 2.9% year-on-year, down from 3%, while month-on-month growth increased to 0.4% from 0.3%[4] - Housing inflation year-on-year was 3.3%, slightly down from 3.4%, indicating a continued moderation trend[4] - Medical services showed a rebound, with year-on-year growth rising to 3.9%[4] Market Reactions and Expectations - Following the inflation data release, U.S. stock indices experienced moderate gains, and the dollar index fell below 97[4] - The probability of the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates before June increased to 68%, up from 62%[4] - The yields on 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds fell to 3.4% and 4.05%, respectively, both reaching new lows since November 2025[4]

Investment Highlights - The construction sector faced pressure in 2025, with the building materials sector showing signs of bottom recovery, as the building materials sector increased by 22.1%, outperforming the construction decoration sector which only rose by 6.7% [2][15][22]. Construction Sector Analysis - The construction sector is under significant fundamental pressure, with a focus on three main investment directions: overseas expansion through the "Belt and Road" initiative, resource value reassessment, and state-owned enterprise reform [3][5]. - The domestic traditional infrastructure investment growth rate is slowing, and real estate construction continues to weaken, limiting the improvement space for the sector [3][5]. - Companies with business transformation capabilities and those positioned in high-growth niche markets performed well, while engineering consulting firms faced pressure due to local government financial constraints [3][5]. Building Materials Sector Analysis - The building materials sector is experiencing structural differentiation, with some segments expected to reach a turning point, particularly consumer building materials [4][5]. - Despite weak real estate data, the marginal negative impact on the building materials sector has significantly decreased, with supply-side improvements expected to precede demand-side recovery [4][5]. - The cement industry is recovering from price bottoming, while the glass industry remains under pressure, and the fiberglass sector is seeing significant improvements due to structural demand [4][5][41][46]. Investment Recommendations - In the construction sector, focus on leading infrastructure companies benefiting from overseas projects and major engineering, such as China Communications Construction Company, China State Construction Engineering, and China Railway Construction Corporation [5]. - In the building materials sector, attention should be given to leading consumer building material companies like Sangke Tree, Oriental Yuhong, and Beixin Building Materials, as well as cyclical building material leaders like Huaxin Cement and China National Building Material [5]. Belt and Road Initiative - The "Belt and Road" initiative has created significant opportunities for the construction sector, with a notable increase in overseas orders and contracts signed in 2025, amounting to $257.98 billion, a 10.8% increase year-on-year [77][79]. - The demand for infrastructure in countries participating in the initiative is expected to grow rapidly, providing a substantial project pool for construction companies [77][79]. Resource Value Reassessment - The expectation of rising prices for non-ferrous metals is anticipated to benefit state-owned construction companies that have acquired valuable mineral resources through past projects [3][5]. State-Owned Enterprise Reform - Policies promoting the securitization of state-owned assets and mergers and acquisitions are expected to create value reassessment opportunities for state-owned construction companies with quality assets [3][5].

- The report introduces a quantitative model for evaluating equity funds, using 22 benchmark indices as independent variables and fund returns as dependent variables. The model applies a rolling window regression with a 6-month window to calculate the R² matrix for each fund. The benchmark index with the highest average R² over the last six periods is selected as the reference index for fund performance evaluation[18][19][24] - The construction process of the model involves linear regression for each benchmark index and fund return, followed by rolling window regression to derive the R² matrix. The formula used is $ R² = 1 - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(y_i - \hat{y}_i)^2}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(y_i - \bar{y})^2} $, where $ y_i $ represents fund returns, $ \hat{y}_i $ represents predicted returns, and $ \bar{y} $ represents the mean of fund returns[18][19][24] - The model is evaluated as effective in identifying the most relevant benchmark index for fund performance, providing a robust framework for fund classification and strategy analysis[18][24] - The backtesting results of the model show that the average R² value for equity funds decreased slightly from 0.7478 in December to 0.7336 in January, indicating a slight reduction in the fit of funds to single benchmark indices[34] - The report categorizes equity funds into five styles: large-cap, mid-small-cap, value, growth, and thematic sectors. The classification is based on the benchmark index with the highest R² value derived from the model[24][27][33] - The performance of mid-small-cap funds was the highest in January, with a median return of 8.18%, followed by growth funds at 7.08%, large-cap funds at 4.13%, value funds at 3.88%, and thematic sector funds at 3.37%[24][25][27] - The thematic sector funds are further divided into categories such as healthcare, cyclical, infrastructure, consumption, technology, finance, and advanced manufacturing. Among these, cyclical funds performed the best, with an average return of 21.6% for active funds and 18.2% for passive funds[27][30][32] - The report highlights high-rated funds, defined as AAA and AA+ funds, which demonstrate strong alpha sustainability and upward alpha trends. AAA funds are stable alpha-type funds suitable for long-term holdings, while AA+ funds exhibit steadily increasing alpha values, indicating strong potential for excess returns[47][48][49] - The report identifies new emerging funds, defined as funds receiving their first rating this month and managed by fund managers with less than three years of experience. These funds predominantly track indices such as CSI Dividend and CSI 300[63][64] - The report also highlights funds with significant rating upgrades, defined as funds whose ratings improved substantially compared to the previous month. These funds are primarily aligned with indices such as CSI Cyclical, CSI Dividend, and TMT (CITIC)[65][66]

Investment Rating - The industry rating is "Outperform the Market," indicating that the overall return of the industry is expected to exceed the market benchmark index by more than 5% in the next 6 months [12]. Core Insights - The recent launch of ByteDance's AI video generation model, Seedance 2.0, has gained significant attention both domestically and internationally, with demonstration videos achieving over a million views on social media platforms [2]. - Seedance 2.0 has made substantial upgrades in video generation capabilities, including automatic storyboard planning and maintaining character consistency across multiple shots, which simplifies the creative process [3]. - The model reflects three major trends: the evolution of video generation capabilities into a systematic creative process, the increasing importance of IP value and copyright barriers, and the potential for AI short dramas and animations to become significant market players by 2025, with an expected market size exceeding 100 billion yuan [4]. Summary by Sections Industry Dynamics - Seedance 2.0's internal testing has led to a surge in social media discussions, highlighting its impact on the industry [2]. - The model supports various input modalities and can generate high-quality videos, enhancing user engagement [2][3]. Technological Advancements - Key upgrades in Seedance 2.0 include self-storyboarding, multi-shot character consistency, and a significant increase in video usability to over 90% [3]. Market Trends - The shift towards systematic creative capabilities indicates a competitive landscape focused on practical applications and ecosystem development [4]. - The scarcity of quality IP is becoming more pronounced, enhancing the bargaining power of platforms with strong IP reserves in the AI era [4]. - The anticipated growth in AI short dramas and animations is expected to lower production costs and increase market penetration, with projections of 33,000 micro-dramas and nearly 700 million users by 2025 [4]. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on the ByteDance AI video industry chain, including related computing power sectors such as ByteDance AIDC and ByteDance ASIC [5].

Group 1 - The core narrative of the report indicates that the AI industry in China and the US is in a transitional phase, moving from "upstream selling shovels" and "new technology demand" to "empowering the entire industry" [9][10] - Three types of companies are identified as potential beneficiaries of the technology revolution: 1) upstream core technology and equipment suppliers, 2) companies corresponding to new demands generated by new technologies, and 3) companies applying new technologies to existing industries for empowerment [2][30] - The report emphasizes that the current market for the AI industry in China is still primarily driven by valuation rather than performance, indicating that it has not yet entered the second phase of performance-driven growth [15][20] Group 2 - The report outlines a methodology based on three dimensions: macro narrative, stock price drivers, and financial screening, to identify companies that may benefit from the AI wave [21][24] - Revenue growth is highlighted as a leading indicator of whether a company is benefiting from the technology revolution, typically preceding profit jumps by about one quarter [74][77] - The report notes that two operational strategies can cause revenue signals to fail: transitioning to new technology businesses and making early investments, which may delay profit realization [82][86] Group 3 - Historical comparisons are made between the US internet revolution (1985-2005) and the mobile internet cycle in China (2007-2015), illustrating how valuation and profit transitions have occurred in past technology revolutions [32][43] - The report discusses the importance of cash flow and advance payments as more comprehensive and forward-looking indicators compared to revenue alone, aiding in the identification of companies with potential profit inflection points [74][80] - The analysis of representative companies from both the US and China during previous technology cycles shows that stock price movements often align with the phases of valuation expansion and profit realization [51][62]

Group 1: Private Credit Market Overview - The private credit market in the U.S. has grown to nearly $1.3 trillion, accounting for about 10% of total commercial bank credit as of 2023[3] - Private credit primarily serves small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), with non-bank investors like pension funds and insurance companies participating through private credit funds and Business Development Companies (BDCs)[3] - BDCs are required to disclose data regularly, providing a window into the private credit market, with BDCs managing assets that have tripled since 2020[19] Group 2: Credit Quality and Returns - Cash flows for many mid-sized companies are recovering post-rate cuts, but BDC shareholder returns are declining due to lower profitability and mandatory profit distribution requirements[4] - The average dividend coverage ratio for publicly traded BDCs fell from 1.34 in mid-2023 to 1.08 by September 2025, indicating weakened ability to cover dividends[4] - Non-accrual investments in BDCs have increased from 0.8% in 2022 to over 1.2% by Q3 2025, suggesting rising credit risk[4] Group 3: Rising Default Risks - Credit rating agencies report an upward trend in default rates within the private credit market, with "invisible defaults" also on the rise, indicating hidden risks[5] - The software and healthcare sectors are particularly vulnerable, with software companies facing high leverage and potential disruption from AI advancements[5] - Nearly 14% of commercial real estate loans are in negative equity, raising concerns about the stability of this sector[5]

Employment Data - In January, non-farm employment increased significantly by 130,000, surpassing the expected 65,000, marking the largest increase since January 2025[7] - Private sector employment added 172,000 jobs in January, with a three-month average of 103,000 and a fourth-quarter average of 50,000[7] - The education and healthcare sectors contributed the majority of the employment increase, adding 137,000 jobs[8] Unemployment and Labor Participation - The unemployment rate fell by 0.1 percentage points to 4.3%, driven by improved job demand[9] - The labor participation rate rebounded by 0.1 percentage points to 62.5%, primarily due to increases in the 20-54 age group[13] Wage Growth - Average hourly earnings increased by 0.4% month-on-month, exceeding the expected 0.3%[19] - Year-on-year wage growth decreased slightly to 3.7%, remaining stable within the 3.7%-3.9% range since the second half of 2025[19] Market Expectations - Following the strong employment data, the probability of a Federal Reserve rate cut in March dropped from 21.7% to 7.9%, and the probability of a cut before June decreased from 75% to 59.8%[2] - U.S. stock indices rose, the dollar strengthened, and U.S. Treasury yields increased, with the 10-year yield reaching a high of 4.2% before retreating[2]