证券研究报告 | 行业周报 gszqdatemark 2026 02 01 年 月 日 电力设备 独立储能发布顶层文件定调行业盈利，宁德时代新生产基地落户云南 光伏：硅片价格下移，电池组件价格上涨。据安泰科，本周多晶硅主流产品市场无成交 记录，观望情绪成为市场主导，全周未出现规模性交易，仅少数企业达成小额试探性订 单，新单签约量几近停滞。据 InfoLink，本周硅片价格延续前期下行态势，整体均价如 期下滑，市场价格重心持续下探。电池片价格方面，本周 183N、210RN、210N 型号均 价上行至 0.45 元/瓦，三款产品价格区间均为 0.43-0.45 元/瓦。受白银价格大幅上涨 推高组件生产成本影响，组件企业被迫上调报价。目前国内分布式组件报价区间为 0.8- 0.88 元/瓦，实际成交价格则在 0.75-0.8 元/瓦区间波动；TOPCon 组件国内均价上调至 0.739 元/瓦，受分布式装机占比持续提升、且分布式 TOPCon 组件成交均价涨至 0.76 元/瓦的拉动，整体价格迎来调涨。核心关注三大方向：1）供给侧改革下的产业链涨价 机会，核心关注通威股份、协鑫科技、隆基绿能、晶澳科技、晶科能源、 ...

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is maintained as "Increase" [5] Core Insights - The report highlights an increase in coal auction listings in Mongolia for 2025, with a total of 40.8832 million tons listed, up by 14.272 million tons. However, the transaction volume is slightly lower than in 2024, at 21.792 million tons, down by 0.576 million tons [2] - The report emphasizes the performance of specific companies, recommending investments in China Coal Energy (H+A), Yanzhou Coal Mining (H+A), China Shenhua Energy (H+A), and Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry. It also highlights companies focusing on smart mining, such as Keda Control, and those undergoing turnaround, like China Qinfa [3][7] - The report notes that the core port for coal transactions remains Ganqimaodu, contributing 83% of the total transaction volume [2] Summary by Sections Energy Prices Overview - As of January 30, 2026, Brent crude oil futures settled at $70.69 per barrel, up by $4.81 (7.3%) from the previous week. WTI crude oil futures settled at $65.21 per barrel, up by $4.14 (6.78%) [1] - Natural gas prices showed mixed trends, with Northeast Asia LNG spot prices at $11.68 per million British thermal units, down by $0.13 (-1.11%). The Dutch TTF gas futures settled at €40.65 per megawatt-hour, up by €1.28 (3.24%) [1] - Coal prices increased, with European ARA port coal prices at $101.50 per ton, up by $3.00 (3.05%), and Newcastle port coal prices at $116.75 per ton, up by $5.25 (4.71%) [1] Auction Performance - The report indicates that ETT led the auction with a transaction of 12.5696 million tons, followed by small TT and ER with 5.3632 million tons and 3.1296 million tons, respectively. The report also notes that coking coal transactions totaled 13.6192 million tons, down by 3.0656 million tons, while thermal coal transactions increased by 3.584 million tons to 8.1728 million tons [6] Key Stocks - The report provides a detailed table of recommended stocks, including: - China Coal Energy (601898.SH) with an EPS forecast of 1.21 for 2025 and a PE ratio of 11.32 - China Shenhua Energy (601088.SH) with an EPS forecast of 2.56 for 2025 and a PE ratio of 16.38 - Yanzhou Coal Mining (600188.SH) with an EPS forecast of 0.99 for 2025 and a PE ratio of 14.86 [7]

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Accumulate" rating for the industry [5] Core Insights - The retail sector is expected to show varied performance in Q4 2025, with significant growth in certain segments like gold and jewelry, while others like supermarkets and department stores are projected to decline [1][2][4] - The report highlights the importance of the upcoming Spring Festival season, suggesting that sectors with performance elasticity, such as duty-free shops and certain tourist attractions, should be closely monitored [9] - The report emphasizes the potential of AI applications in enhancing e-commerce marketing, indicating a shift towards new retail strategies [9] Summary by Relevant Sections Retail Sector Outlook - Gold and Jewelry: - Lao Feng Xiang: Expected net profit growth of -15% to 5% in Q4 2025 - Zhou Da Sheng: Expected net profit growth of 15% to 30% in Q4 2025 - Chao Hong Ji: Forecasted net profit of 1.2 to 2.2 billion, with a year-on-year increase of 125% to 175% - Cai Bai Co.: Expected net profit growth of 150% to 254% in Q4 2025 - Yu Garden Co.: Forecasted loss of 4.312 billion in Q4 2025, compared to a loss of 1.03 billion in the same period last year [1] - Trendy Toys: - Miniso: Expected revenue growth of 25% to 30% in Q4 2025, with adjusted net profit growth of 10% to 20% [1] Supermarkets and Department Stores - Chongqing Department Store: Expected net profit of 1.021 billion, a decline of 22.4% year-on-year, with a projected drop of 92.5% in Q4 2025 - Wangfujing: Expected net profit loss of 0.45 to 0.23 billion, with a growth rate of -6.6% to 7.3% in Q4 2025 - Yonghui Supermarket: Expected loss of 2.14 billion, with a net profit growth rate of -3.1% in Q4 2025 - Home Home Joy: Expected net profit of 198 to 228 million, with a growth rate of 50.1% to 72.8% in Q4 2025 [2] Cross-Border and E-commerce - Small Commodity City: Expected net profit growth of 5% to 15% in Q4 2025 - Anker Innovation: Expected net profit growth of 10% to 20% in Q4 2025 - Su Mei Da: Expected net profit of 1.355 billion, with a growth rate of 70.8% in Q4 2025 [3] Social Services Sector Outlook - Duty-Free: China Duty-Free Group: Expected net profit growth of 29% to 173% in Q4 2025 - Tourism: - Songcheng Performance: Expected net profit growth of -204% to 294% in Q4 2025 - Jiuhua Tourism: Expected net profit growth of 0% to 15% in Q4 2025 [4] Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on sectors with performance elasticity during the Spring Festival, including duty-free, certain tourist attractions, and gold and jewelry [9] - For 2026, the report suggests looking at service consumption and product consumption, particularly in duty-free and travel chains, as well as undervalued segments with improving fundamentals [9]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for key companies in the construction central enterprises sector, including China Railway, China Chemical, China Construction, and China Metallurgical [12][13][32]. Core Insights - The construction central enterprises are expected to see improved profitability driven by policy goals aimed at stabilizing investment. Order data shows a recovery in order growth starting from Q2 2025, with an anticipated narrowing of performance declines by Q4 2025 [1][16]. - The overall valuation of the nine major construction central enterprises is at historical lows, with a Price-to-Book (PB) ratio of 0.45 and a Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio of 6.66, indicating strong safety margins [2][19]. - Institutional holdings in the construction sector are at low levels, suggesting a healthy chip structure and potential for recovery in key stocks [3][22]. Summary by Sections Order Growth and Performance - Cumulative order growth rates for construction central enterprises from Q1 to Q4 2025 are -2.0%, +0.2%, +1.3%, and +1.0%, respectively, indicating a recovery trend [1][16]. - The report anticipates that the performance decline of construction central enterprises will narrow in Q4 2025 due to improved order growth [1][16]. Valuation Metrics - As of January 30, 2026, the overall PB for the nine major construction central enterprises is 0.45, slightly above the historical low of 0.42, while the overall PE is 6.66, still below the historical median of 7.66 [2][19]. Institutional Holdings - As of Q4 2025, active funds hold 0.40% of the construction sector, while index funds hold 0.16%, leading to a combined holding of 0.28%, significantly lower than the 0.7%-1% range seen in 2021-2022 [3][22]. Catalysts for Growth - Several potential catalysts for the construction central enterprises include resource business revaluation for China Railway, chemical price rebounds for China Chemical, and increased investment in the power grid for China Electric Power and China Energy Construction [4][26]. - The upcoming "14th Five-Year Plan" is expected to bring about fiscal policies that could further stimulate the sector [4][26]. Recommended Stocks - Key recommendations include: - China Railway (A/H): Benefiting from resource revaluation, with a combined value of 1,894 billion CNY for its resource and engineering segments, indicating a potential upside of 35% [5][27]. - China Chemical: Positioned to benefit from chemical price rebounds, with a current PB of 0.84, indicating a strong safety margin [9][28]. - China Construction: Expected to benefit from stabilizing real estate expectations, with a projected dividend yield of 5.5% [10][30]. - China Metallurgical: Anticipated to improve significantly post divestment of its loss-making real estate business, with a combined valuation potential of 794 billion CNY [11][31].

核心结论：凯文·沃什获得提名属于超预期的结果，直至本次提名宣布 前一天，沃什和里德尔的概率仍相差不大。政策主张看，沃什主张缩表 和降息并行，比现任主席鲍威尔更偏鸽派、但比此前的热门人选哈塞 特更偏鹰派。沃什的提名后续仍需要参议院的确认，但由于鲍威尔受 到司法调查一事引发诸多共和党参议员不满，参议院确认进程可能不 会很顺畅。沃什提名前后，市场对美联储降息的预期变化不大，目前市 场仍预期下次降息在 6 月、全年降息 2 次，这可能是由于沃什的政策 立场相对中性且更加"灵活"。市场影响方面，短期看，预计沃什的提 名将利空美股和黄金，并推升美元和美债收益率，尤其是黄金，目前做 多较为拥挤且估值已处于高位，阶段性回调压力较大；中长期看，沃什 能否保持政策独立性仍是影响市场的核心变量，需持续关注。 1、沃什的背景资料及政策主张？ 证券研究报告 | 宏观研究 gszqdatemark 2026 02 01 年 月 日 宏观点评 美联储迎来沃什，4 大关键点 事件：北京时间 1 月 30 日 19:48，美国总统特朗普在其个人社交媒体 Truth Social 上宣布，将提名凯文·沃什担任下一届美联储主席。 >背景资料：凯文 ...

证券研究报告 | 行业周报 gszqdatemark 2026 02 01 年 月 日 交通运输 干散货运价淡季回升，继续重视油运 周观点：VLCC 运价周五再度冲高；干散货运价淡季超预期回升，大船更为明 显。VLCC 市场，本周 VLCC 市场中东航线 2 月上旬货盘基本收尾，租家出货 节奏放缓，运价在周四之前高位回落；随着运价下跌，船东对进一步下跌表现 出较强抵抗意愿，潜在地缘政治风险再度升温，1 月 30 日，波斯湾至中国 27 万吨原油运价指数升至 WS137.2 点，较 1 月 29 日上涨 42.6 点。受矿石、粮 食等品种发货需求较好支撑，本周干散货运价持续回升，BDI 于 1 月 30 日收 于 2148 点，大船涨势更为明显，BCI 于 1 月 30 日收于 3507 点。重点关注招 商轮船、中远海能、海通发展、中远海运国际和中集安瑞科等。 行情回顾：本周（2026.1.26-2026.1.30）交通运输板块行业指数下跌 1.40%， 跑输上证指数 0.96 个百分点（上证指数下跌 0.44%）。从申万交通运输行业 三级分类看，涨幅前三名的板块分别为航运、港口、高速公路，涨幅分别为 2.19 ...

Investment Rating - The report provides a positive investment rating for solar equipment suppliers, particularly highlighting companies like Maiwei Co., Ltd. and others with potential capabilities in the solar photovoltaic sector [7][33]. Core Insights - The demand for space photovoltaic systems is expected to surge due to the explosive growth in satellite deployment and AI computing power in space, with China planning to submit applications for 203,000 satellites by the end of 2025, while the U.S. has already launched over 10,000 satellites [1][10]. - New technological pathways such as P-type HJT and perovskite tandem cells are emerging, offering lower costs and improved performance compared to traditional gallium arsenide batteries, which are currently too expensive for large-scale deployment [2][27]. - The global manufacturing landscape is shifting, presenting historic opportunities for Chinese equipment and battery manufacturers to expand internationally, especially as the U.S. lacks capabilities in HJT and perovskite production lines [3][29]. Summary by Sections Section 1: Satellite Deployment and Space AI - The global low Earth orbit satellite deployment is entering a critical phase, with intense competition between China and the U.S. for orbital resources and frequency bands [10]. - The AI computing explosion is creating a new paradigm for space-based data centers, which can operate continuously under sunlight and utilize the cold of space for cooling, leading to exponential growth in demand for space photovoltaic systems [1][10]. Section 2: Technological Advancements - P-type HJT batteries and silicon/perovskite tandem cells are identified as the main directions for future space photovoltaic technology, with significant advantages in efficiency and cost [2][16]. - The report highlights the limitations of traditional gallium arsenide batteries, which are costly and reliant on scarce materials, making them unsuitable for large-scale satellite constellations [2][26]. Section 3: Global Market Dynamics - The report emphasizes that the demand for solar photovoltaic systems in space is set to enter a new cycle, benefiting domestic equipment and battery manufacturers as they transition from ground support to core space applications [29][30]. - Companies like Junda Co., Ltd., Trina Solar, and others are noted for their advancements in space-grade batteries and solar technologies, positioning them well for future growth in the space photovoltaic market [30][33].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for key companies in the textile and apparel industry, including Li Ning, Anta Sports, Shenzhou International, and others [9][21][29]. Core Insights - The textile and apparel industry is experiencing a low overall fund holding ratio, with a total market value of approximately 9.76 billion yuan at the end of Q4 2025, slightly down from 10.31 billion yuan at the end of Q3 2025. However, the proportion of heavy holdings increased from 0.13% to 0.25% [1][12]. - The report highlights the resilience of the sports footwear and apparel sector, predicting it will outperform the broader apparel market in the long term. Companies like Li Ning and Anta Sports are expected to manage inventory effectively and benefit from upcoming marketing initiatives [2][17]. - The report emphasizes the healthy inventory levels in the industry, anticipating that stable replenishment from downstream will lead to increased orders for upstream manufacturers [3][18]. - The report suggests focusing on quality stocks with stable growth or potential for performance reversal, particularly in the brand apparel segment, where companies like HLA and Luolai Living are highlighted for their growth prospects [4][19]. Summary by Sections Fund Position Analysis - The textile and apparel sector's fund holding ratio remains low, with significant increases in holdings across sub-sectors such as home textiles, textile manufacturing, and accessories [1][12][15]. Market Performance - The textile and apparel sector underperformed compared to the CSI 300 index, with declines noted in both textile manufacturing and brand apparel segments [24][25]. Key Company Recommendations - Li Ning is recommended due to its expected brand strength during the Olympic cycle, with projected profits of 2.74 billion yuan in 2025 and a growth forecast for 2026 [2][17]. - Anta Sports is highlighted for its strong operational capabilities, with expected profits of 13.2 billion yuan in 2025 and growth in 2026 [2][17]. - Shenzhou International is recommended for its cost-effectiveness and positive customer trends, with a projected PE ratio of 11 times for 2026 [3][18]. - HLA is expected to see stable profit growth, with a projected PE ratio of 12 times for 2026 [4][19].

宏观点评 核心结论：凯文·沃什获得提名属于超预期的结果，直至本次提名宣布 前一天，沃什和里德尔的概率仍相差不大。政策主张看，沃什主张缩表 和降息并行，比现任主席鲍威尔更偏鸽派、但比此前的热门人选哈塞 特更偏鹰派。沃什的提名后续仍需要参议院的确认，但由于鲍威尔受 到司法调查一事引发诸多共和党参议员不满，参议院确认进程可能不 会很顺畅。沃什提名前后，市场对美联储降息的预期变化不大，目前市 场仍预期下次降息在 6 月、全年降息 2 次，这可能是由于沃什的政策 立场相对中性且更加"灵活"。市场影响方面，短期看，预计沃什的提 名将利空美股和黄金，并推升美元和美债收益率，尤其是黄金，目前做 多较为拥挤且估值已处于高位，阶段性回调压力较大；中长期看，沃什 能否保持政策独立性仍是影响市场的核心变量，需持续关注。 1、沃什的背景资料及政策主张？ >背景资料：凯文·沃什 1970 年 4 月 13 日生于美国纽约州奥尔巴尼， 共和党籍，毕业于斯坦福大学（文学学士）和哈佛大学（法学博士）， 曾担任过摩根士丹利高管、小布什总统经济政策特别助理兼国家经济 委员会执行秘书、美联储理事，现任胡佛研究所访问学者、斯坦福商学 院讲师、国会预算 ...

1. Report Industry Investment Rating There is no information provided in the report regarding the industry investment rating. 2. Core Viewpoint of the Report The report analyzes the asset allocation changes of public - offering bond funds in Q4 2025. In Q4, medium - and long - term pure bond funds continued to shrink, while second - tier bond funds maintained growth. All types of bond funds increased their bond positions, with second - tier bond funds reducing their stock positions. Short - term bond funds increased leverage, medium - and long - term bond funds decreased leverage, and most bond funds reduced duration. All bond funds significantly increased their allocation to credit bonds and reduced their allocation to interest - rate bonds. There were signs of marginal credit downgrading in the top - holding bonds, and there were regional differences in the allocation of top - holding urban investment bonds. [1][2][3] 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Medium - and Long - term Pure Bond Funds Shrink, Second - tier Bond Funds Grow In Q4 2025, the scale of medium - and long - term pure bond funds continued to shrink, while the scale of second - tier bond funds maintained growth. The total net asset value of the four types of bond funds was 9.2 trillion yuan, an increase of 151.2 billion yuan from the previous quarter. Medium - and long - term pure bond funds decreased by 154.9 billion yuan to 5.76 trillion yuan, short - term pure bond funds increased by 69.9 billion yuan to 1.02 trillion yuan. The first - tier bond funds decreased by 14 billion yuan to 833.1 billion yuan, and second - tier bond funds increased by 250.3 billion yuan to 1.6 trillion yuan. [1][10] 3.2 Asset Structure: Bond Positions Increase In terms of asset allocation structure, the scale contraction led medium - and long - term bond funds to reduce their bond holdings, while second - tier bond funds increased their bond allocation due to share expansion. The four types of funds collectively increased their bond holdings by 168.1 billion yuan. By the end of 2025, medium - and long - term pure bond funds, short - term pure bond funds, first - tier bond funds, and second - tier bond funds held bond market values of 6.69 trillion yuan, 1.1 trillion yuan, 941 billion yuan, and 1.42 trillion yuan respectively. Medium - and long - term pure bond funds reduced their holdings by 186.3 billion yuan, while short - term pure bond funds, first - tier bond funds, and second - tier bond funds increased their holdings by 84.2 billion yuan, 17.5 billion yuan, and 252.6 billion yuan respectively. The bond positions of all types of bond funds increased, and the stock position of second - tier bond funds decreased slightly. [18][19] 3.3 Medium - and Long - term Bond Funds Reduce Leverage and Control Duration Short - term bond funds increased leverage, while medium - and long - term bond funds decreased leverage. In Q4, short - term pure bond funds adopted a defensive coupon strategy of "increasing leverage + reducing duration", with the leverage ratio increasing by 0.26 pct to 111.66%. Medium - and long - term pure bond funds actively reduced leverage due to net redemption pressure and unstable long - term interest rates, with the leverage ratio decreasing by 0.92 pct to 115.83%. The leverage ratios of first - tier and second - tier bond funds increased by 1.58 pct and 0.82 pct to 113.53% and 111.59% respectively. Most bond funds reduced their duration exposure. The arithmetic average durations of medium - and long - term interest - rate bond funds, medium - and long - term credit bond funds, short - term interest - rate bond funds, and short - term credit bond funds in Q4 were 3.35 years, 2.38 years, 0.99 years, and 0.88 years respectively, decreasing by 0.23 years, 0.15 years, 0.19 years compared to Q3, and the short - term credit bond fund increased by 0.02 years. [28] 3.4 Bond Type Portfolio: Increase Allocation to Credit Bonds, Reduce Allocation to Interest - rate Bonds In Q4, the four types of bond funds collectively increased their credit bond holdings by 306.1 billion yuan and reduced their interest - rate bond holdings by 117.4 billion yuan. Among pure bond funds, medium - and long - term bond funds reduced interest - rate bonds and increased credit bonds, and short - term bond funds increased their credit bond allocation more than interest - rate bonds. Among bond funds with equity components, first - tier bond funds mainly increased their credit bond holdings, and second - tier bond funds increased their credit bond allocation more than interest - rate bonds. In terms of specific bond types, medium - and long - term pure bond funds mainly reduced their holdings of treasury bonds, policy - financial bonds, and financial bonds and increased their holdings of medium - term notes; short - term pure bond funds mainly increased their holdings of financial bonds, policy - financial bonds, and commercial paper; first - tier bond funds mainly increased their holdings of financial bonds; second - tier bond funds mainly increased their holdings of financial bonds and policy - financial bonds. The proportion of policy - financial bonds in the interest - rate bond portfolio of most bond funds increased. [35][43][52] 3.5 Top - holding Bond Analysis: Rating Central Tendency Migrates Downward In Q4 2025, bond funds significantly reduced their holdings of interest - rate bonds, slightly reduced their holdings of urban investment bonds, increased their holdings of convertible bonds, industrial bonds, and certificates of deposit, and slightly increased their holdings of financial bonds. There were signs of marginal credit downgrading in the top - holding bonds. Most bond funds reduced the proportion of AAA - rated bonds and increased the proportion of AA - and below - rated bonds. In terms of regional allocation of top - holding urban investment bonds, bond funds significantly reduced their holdings of urban investment bonds in Zhejiang and Anhui and increased their holdings in Sichuan and Chongqing. [55][58][65]