Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Report Core View - In the week ending December 26, 2025, the net inflow of bond - type ETFs totaled 61.982 billion yuan, and the cumulative net inflow for the year reached 630.534 billion yuan. The performance of various bond ETF products' net worth has recovered, and different types of bond ETFs have different performance in terms of net inflow and net worth changes [4][5]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Funds Flow - As of December 26, 2025, bond - type ETFs had a total net inflow of 61.982 billion yuan in the past week. Interest - rate, credit, and convertible - bond ETFs had net inflows of 1.586 billion yuan, 63.164 billion yuan, and a net outflow of 2.768 billion yuan respectively. Among credit - type ETFs, short - term financing had a net outflow of 5.219 billion yuan, corporate bonds had a net inflow of 4.419 billion yuan, urban investment bonds had a net inflow of 0.008 billion yuan, market - making credit bonds had a net inflow of 7.262 billion yuan, and science - innovation bonds had a net inflow of 56.694 billion yuan. The cumulative net inflows of interest - rate, credit, and convertible - bond ETFs for the year were 76.305 billion yuan, 536.450 billion yuan, and 17.780 billion yuan respectively [4]. 3.2 Net Worth Performance - As of December 26, 2025, the 30 - year Treasury Bond ETF Boshi performed well, rising 0.17% for the week, and the 10 - year local government bond ETF rose 0.16%. Convertible - bond ETF and Shanghai Stock Exchange Convertible Bond ETF rose 1.56% and 1.23% respectively last week [5]. 3.3 Performance of Credit - Bond ETFs and Science - Innovation Bond ETFs - As of December 26, 2025, the median net asset values per unit of credit - bond ETFs and science - innovation bond ETFs were 1.0119 and 1.0002 respectively, rising 0.12% and 0.13% for the week. Among credit - bond ETFs, E Fund Corporate Bond ETF and Credit - Bond ETF performed relatively well, rising 0.16% and 0.14% respectively for the week. Among science - innovation bond ETFs, Taikang Science - Innovation Bond ETF performed relatively well. The median discount rate of credit - bond ETFs was 20BP, and the median premium rate of science - innovation bond ETFs was 2BP [6]. 3.4 Credit - Type ETF Duration Tracking - As of December 26, 2025, the holding durations of short - term financing ETF, corporate bond ETF, and urban investment bond ETF were 0.38 years, 1.79 years, and 2.17 years respectively. Among market - making credit - bond ETFs, the median holding durations of products tracking the Shanghai Market - Making Corporate Bond and Shenzhen Market - Making Corporate Bond indexes were 3.77 years and 2.84 years respectively. Among science - innovation bond ETFs, the median holding durations of products tracking the AAA Science - Innovation Bond, Shanghai AAA Science - Innovation Bond, and Shenzhen AAA Science - Innovation Bond indexes were 3.42 years, 3.31 years, and 3.22 years respectively [9]. 3.5 Report Abstract - Last week, the ChinaBond New Composite Index rose 0.14% for the week; short - term pure - bond and medium - and long - term pure - bond funds rose 0.03% and 0.04% respectively; the ChinaBond AAA Science - Innovation Bond Index and the Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market - Making Corporate Bond Index rose 0.13% and 0.13% respectively [8].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the industry [2] Core Insights - The current wealth management market (2025-2026) shows increased differentiation and stratification compared to the previous cycle (2020-2021), with a focus on matching client needs [5][10] - Financial institutions are transitioning from a "sell-side" sales model to a "buy-side" advisory model, emphasizing long-term service capabilities and precise matching of client needs [5][10] - Investment opportunities are expected to favor financial institutions with a strong middle-to-high value client base, comprehensive services, and innovative product offerings [5][10] Summary by Sections Common Logic of Two Cycles - Both cycles are characterized by ample liquidity supporting asset prices, with the previous cycle driven by aggressive monetary and fiscal policies, while the current cycle is marked by low interest rates and excess precautionary savings [9][16] - Clear industry trends guide capital flows, with the previous cycle dominated by consumption and new energy, while the current cycle is led by AI and hard technology [9][22] - The trend of asset migration from real estate to financial assets is irreversible, continuing the financialization process [9][25] Core Differences of Two Cycles - The macro environment has shifted from "strong stimulus expansion" to "weak recovery defense," with a focus on stabilizing growth and managing risks [25][27] - There is a notable change in resident expectations and risk preferences, with a shift from broad income growth to increased differentiation among income groups [35][38] - Asset allocation logic has evolved from a singular offensive strategy to a diversified and balanced approach, incorporating defensive assets alongside growth opportunities [46][50] Characteristics of the Previous Cycle - The previous cycle was driven by strong stimulus measures, resulting in a significant recovery in GDP and a structural bull market in equities, particularly in high-growth sectors [3][9] - The investment behavior was aggressive, with high turnover and a focus on chasing high-performing assets, leading to a "star chasing" phenomenon among investors [3][9] Current Cycle and Future Characteristics - The current cycle is characterized by low interest rates and a new normal of asset revaluation, with a gradual but steady migration of assets [10][25] - The asset side is moving towards a balanced approach, with a mix of high-dividend and growth assets, and an increasing preference for alternative investments as risk hedges [10][50] - Financial institutions are expected to focus on client segmentation, asset allocation capabilities, and long-term service value, with a shift towards a "buy-side" advisory model [10][55]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the document 2. Core Views of the Report - This week, both the US and Chinese stock markets performed well, with the US three major stock indices rising over 1% and the Shanghai Composite Index rising 1.9%. The growth is due to the resonance of the global technology sector and year - end pre - positioning [4]. - Market risk preference is on the rise. Since mid - December, the S&P 500 volatility has generally declined, and the basis discount of stock index futures has narrowed since December [4]. - Leverage funds' activity significantly increased this week, becoming a major driving factor for the market. The proportion of margin trading turnover in A - share turnover rebounded, and leverage funds flowed into major broad - based indices [5]. - In 2026, the incremental funds flowing into the stock market are estimated to be 3.1 trillion yuan, and the scale of "fixed income +" products will double. If the market adjusts in December, incremental funds may pre - position. Next year, technology will still be the most promising direction for the spring rally [7]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Asset Price Performance 3.1.1 Global Asset Performance - Global stocks: Most global stock indices rose, with the Korean Composite Index rising 2.7% and the Nikkei 225 rising 2.5%. The French CAC40 and the British FTSE 100 declined [12]. - Global bonds: US Treasury yields declined, while Japanese and Chinese government bond yields rose [12]. - Global commodities: Precious metals performed well, with COMEX silver rising 18.2% and lithium carbonate rising 16.5%. The US dollar index declined [12]. 3.1.2 A - share Market Performance - Broad - based indices: A - shares generally rose, with the ChiNext and STAR 50 indices rising 3.9% and 2.8% respectively. The CSI 500 and CSI 1000 also had significant gains [21][23]. - Trading volume: Except for the dividend index, the average daily trading volume of broad - based indices increased, returning to the level around mid - August [25]. - Industry performance: The top five rising industries were non - ferrous metals (8.47%), national defense and military industry (7.51%), power equipment (6.27%), machinery and equipment (5.74%), and basic chemicals (5.70%). Most cyclical sectors performed well, except for banks and coal [31]. - Technology sector: Since December, optical modules and optical communications have led the way, and on Monday, most technology sub - sectors rose and many had increased trading volume [35][39]. 3.2 Capital Behavior Tracking 3.2.1 Leverage Funds - Margin trading turnover ratio: The proportion of margin trading turnover in A - share turnover rose from 10.24% to 11.20%. The margin trading balance increased to about 2.53 trillion yuan, and the ratio of margin trading balance to A - share free - float market capitalization slightly decreased [49]. - Inflow into broad - based indices: From Monday to Thursday, leverage funds flowed into major broad - based indices, with the Shanghai Composite Index, CSI 1000, and CSI 300 having daily net inflows of over 2.5 billion yuan. Most broad - based ETFs had net outflows on Monday - Thursday, and on Friday, most broad - based indices had inflows except for the Shanghai Composite Index ETF and ChiNext Index ETF [54]. - Market - cap gradient: Stocks of all market - cap gradients increased leverage, with large - cap stocks above 50 billion yuan having a larger increase. Stocks like Zhongji Innolight, Industrial Fulin, Cambricon, and Zijin Mining had large net margin purchases [58]. - Industry perspective: Industries with large margin net purchases as a proportion of turnover included communications, real estate, machinery and equipment, etc. The national defense and military industry increased leverage for six consecutive weeks, and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery increased leverage for nine consecutive weeks [62]. - Hot stocks: Some hot stocks in the national defense and military industry and electronics added leverage. Stocks like Zhaoyi Innovation, Zhongji Innolight, and others had a margin net purchase as a proportion of turnover exceeding 10% [70]. 3.2.2 Quantitative Funds - Excess return: Since December, the median excess returns of CSI 500 and CSI 1000 quantitative index - enhanced strategies have been - 1.15% and 0.61% respectively [72]. - Futures basis: This week, the near - month stock index futures basis changed from premium to discount, and the far - month contract basis discount narrowed. Excluding the futures delivery week, the basis discount has been narrowing since December [78]. 3.2.3 Main Force Funds - Sector net flows: The main force funds in the CSI 300 and ChiNext continued to have net outflows, but the outflows slowed down. The main force funds in the STAR Market had net outflows for five consecutive trading days, accelerating compared to last week [80]. - Industry flows: Main force funds flowed into the power equipment industry and out of industries such as national defense and military industry, computers, electronics, and non - bank finance [88]. 3.2.4 Northbound Funds - Trading volume and proportion: The total trading volume of northbound funds decreased, with the average daily trading volume dropping from 203 billion yuan to 176.6 billion yuan, and the proportion in A - share trading volume dropping from 11.52% to 9.29% [92]. - Performance of heavy - holding stocks: The heavy - holding stocks of the Northbound Connect changed from rising to falling, and the Northbound Connect 50 index underperformed the CSI 300 [94]. 3.2.5 Southbound Funds - Trading volume and net purchases: The average daily trading volume of southbound funds decreased from 144.2 billion yuan to 110.2 billion yuan, and the proportion increased from 52.3% to 58.9%. The average daily net purchase amount decreased from 2.9 billion yuan to 0.8 billion yuan [99]. - Industry allocation: Southbound funds still had a balanced allocation, flowing into industries such as media, electronics, and non - bank finance, and flowing out of industries such as communications, petroleum and petrochemicals, and non - ferrous metals [102].

- The report introduces a timing system that uses the distance between the 120-day long-term moving average and the 20-day short-term moving average of the WIND All A Index to determine market trends. The short-term moving average is above the long-term moving average, with a distance of 3.38%, which is significantly greater than 3%, indicating the market has returned to an upward trend[2][6][11] - The "profitability effect" is used as a core indicator to assess market conditions. The current market trend line is at 6237 points, and the profitability effect is 3.12%, which is significantly positive, suggesting the upward trend is likely to continue[5][7][11] - The "Mid-term Distress Reversal Expectation Model" signals a focus on retail, tourism, and other service-oriented consumption sectors[5][7][11] - The "TWO BETA Model" continues to recommend the technology sector, with a focus on domestic computing power and commercial aerospace[5][7][11] - The "Industry Trend Model" indicates that sectors such as communication, industrial metals, and energy storage are maintaining an upward trend[5][7][11] - The valuation metrics for the WIND All A Index show that the PE ratio is at the 85th percentile, indicating a relatively high level, while the PB ratio is at the 50th percentile, indicating a medium level[5][7][11] - Based on the "Position Management Model," the report suggests an 80% equity allocation for absolute return products using the WIND All A Index as the primary stock allocation benchmark[5][7][11]

Core Insights - The report highlights the "Net Profit Discontinuity Strategy" which has achieved an absolute return of 69.56% this year, significantly outperforming the benchmark index by 39.29% [10][11]. Group 1: Net Profit Discontinuity Strategy - The strategy focuses on selecting stocks based on two main criteria: "Net Profit," which refers to earnings surprises, and "Discontinuity," indicating a significant upward price gap on the first trading day following earnings announcements, reflecting market recognition of the earnings report [10][11]. - Historical performance shows that from 2010 to the present, the strategy has achieved an annualized return of 29.54%, with an annualized excess return over the benchmark of 26.34% [11]. - The strategy's performance this year includes a cumulative absolute return of 69.56%, with a weekly excess return of -1.49% [11]. Group 2: Davis Double-Click Strategy - The "Davis Double-Click Strategy" involves buying stocks with lower price-to-earnings (PE) ratios that have growth potential, aiming to sell once growth is realized and PE increases, thus achieving a multiplier effect on returns [4][7]. - The strategy has recorded a historical annualized return of 26.45% from 2010 to 2017, with excess returns exceeding 11% in each of the seven complete years during that period [8][11]. - As of December 26, 2025, the strategy has achieved a cumulative absolute return of 56.55%, outperforming the benchmark index by 26.28% [11]. Group 3: Enhanced CSI 300 Portfolio - The Enhanced CSI 300 Portfolio is constructed based on investor preferences categorized into GARP (Growth at a Reasonable Price), growth, and value types, focusing on stocks with strong profitability and stable growth potential [13][18]. - The portfolio has shown stable historical excess returns, with a year-to-date excess return of 20.52% relative to the CSI 300 index [18]. - The strategy's performance includes a cumulative absolute return of 38.87% as of December 26, 2025, with an excess return of 20.52% over the benchmark [15].

Investment Rating - The report provides a positive investment outlook for the tire industry, highlighting significant growth potential and opportunities for domestic tire manufacturers to capture market share from foreign brands [1]. Core Insights - The report emphasizes a substantial replacement opportunity in the tire market, particularly for domestic brands, as they currently hold only 30% market share domestically and 20% internationally. The potential for growth is driven by the increasing demand for cost-effective and high-quality products [3][17]. - The analysis indicates that the tire industry is expected to experience a "Davis double" effect in 2026, where both volume and pricing are anticipated to rise, leading to improved profitability for leading domestic tire manufacturers [3][25]. - The report outlines a multi-faceted approach to market dynamics, focusing on long-term replacement potential, mid-term supply-demand tracking, and short-term monitoring of key variables such as production capacity and cost factors [6][20]. Summary by Sections Research Framework - The long-term perspective indicates a significant replacement space for domestic tire manufacturers, with a focus on supply-demand dynamics and key variables to monitor [6]. 2025 Marginal Changes - The report discusses how changes in trade policies in 2025 will enhance the cost advantages of domestic manufacturers, allowing them to capture more market share from foreign competitors [25]. 2026 Core Changes - It is projected that 2026 will mark a breakthrough year for high-end tire supply, with domestic manufacturers expected to increase their market share in premium segments significantly [25][29]. Stock Recommendations and Focus - The report recommends several domestic tire companies, including Zhongce Rubber, Sailun, and Linglong, while also suggesting to monitor others like Haian Rubber and Triangle for potential investment opportunities [3][29].

Group 1 - The market rebound is primarily driven by enhanced logic of market winning rates both domestically and internationally [2] - Global liquidity concerns have significantly eased, particularly in the US, where the November core CPI rose by 2.6% year-on-year, the lowest since April 2021, boosting optimistic expectations for interest rate cuts [3] - Domestic market support stems from increased expectations for policy-driven liquidity easing and strengthened confidence in industrial development, with the central economic work conference setting clear policy goals for economic growth and price recovery [4] Group 2 - Technology assets are experiencing a contraction and differentiation, driven by "winning rate continuation" and "industrial explosion" logic, with telecommunications and defense industries leading the way [5] - In the cyclical sector, non-ferrous metals have performed well, benefiting from the transmission of technology industry chain prosperity and increased macro risk aversion [6] - The index is expected to show a strong upward trend, with the ChiNext index rising by 5.80% and the Shanghai Composite Index by 1.35% as of December 24 [7] Group 3 - The upcoming spring market is likely to focus on high-prosperity industries, with historical patterns indicating that strong economic conditions paired with strong industries lead to broad market gains [8] - Investment strategies should continue to focus on AI and less crowded technology sectors, global pricing resources, and consumer goods benefiting from moderate price recovery [8] - The January stock selection includes a diverse range of companies across various sectors, such as robotics, consumer goods, and advanced industries, indicating a strategic approach to capitalize on market trends [12][13]

Core Insights - The report predicts a recovery in the commercial sector in 2026, benefiting from supportive policies and a rebound in consumer demand after a bottoming out in 2024-2025 [5][6][9] Sector Outlook Duty-Free - The new duty-free policy starting in November 2025 is expected to drive a strong recovery in the duty-free sector, with a focus on China Duty Free Group and Zhuhai Duty Free Group [6][9][14] Hotels - Hotel operations showed improvement in late 2025, with expectations for growth driven by domestic demand, spring and autumn travel, and inbound tourism in 2026. Key companies to watch include ShouLai Hotel, Junting Hotel, Huazhu Group, and Atour [6][20] Catering - The catering sector showed a year-on-year growth of 3.8% in October 2025, with expectations for recovery in 2026. Companies to focus on include Xiaocaiyuan, Dashishi, Yum China, and Haidilao [21][22] Tea Beverage - Leading tea beverage companies are expected to maintain good growth in 2026, with a focus on brands like Mixue Ice City, Guming, and Tea Baidao [6][25][29] Human Resources - The outsourcing industry is expected to continue steady growth, with a focus on new application scenarios and models. Key companies include Kelly Services, Beijing Human Resources, and Foreign Service Holdings [6][37] Tourism and Scenic Spots - The tourism sector is expected to benefit from holiday effects in 2026, with a focus on companies like Jiuhua Tourism, Emei Mountain A, and Lijiang Shares [31][32] Supermarkets - The trend of reform in supermarkets is expected to continue in 2026, with a focus on companies like Jiajiayue, Xinhua Department Store, and Yonghui Supermarket [7][39] Education - The education sector is expected to maintain a favorable trend, with a focus on companies that can capitalize on the rising demand for vocational education and exam retakes. Key companies include Xueda Education, Kevin Education, and China Oriental Education [7][45]

Report Industry Investment Rating - No information provided Core Viewpoints of the Report - The current market is approaching the phased bottom range, which is a good time to layout the key market window in the first half of next year, especially before the Spring Festival [8]. - In the first half of next year, the most important market will still be before the Spring Festival, and sectors such as securities and technology may experience structural out - performance [8]. - There are significant expected differences among the consumer, non - banking financial, and technology sectors [6]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Market Review - **Market Performance** - Most of the major market indices rose last week, with the Shanghai Composite 50 Index having the largest increase of 0.32% [9][15]. - In terms of major industry performance, the daily consumption index and financial index performed relatively well, with weekly changes of 2.26% and 2.06% respectively; the information technology index and industrial index performed weakly, with changes of - 2.08% and - 1.22% respectively [9][15]. - Among the 30 Shenwan primary industries, 19 industries rose. The industries with relatively large increases were commercial retail, non - banking finance, and beauty care, rising 6.66%, 2.90%, and 2.87% respectively; the industries with relatively large declines were electronics, power equipment, and machinery, falling 3.28%, 3.12%, and 1.56% respectively [9][18]. - **Trading Heat** - The average daily trading volume of Wind All - A last week was 1.760484 trillion yuan (the previous value was 1.953044 trillion yuan), which was at a relatively high level in history (82.30% in the three - year historical quantile) [9][21]. - **Valuation Tracking** - As of December 19, 2025, the valuation (PE_TTM) of Wind All - A was 21.79, an increase of 0.06 from the previous week, and it was at the 89.40% quantile in the past five - year history [26]. - Among the 30 Shenwan primary industries, 19 industries' valuations (PE_TTM) were repaired [26]. Market Observation: Expected Differences in the Year - End Market - **Last Week's Market Conditions** - The market fluctuated and declined last week, with shrinking trading volume and enhanced profit - making effects. The Wind All - A and CSI 300 Index fell 0.15% and 0.28% respectively, while the CSI 2000 Index rose 0.30%. The average daily trading volume of Wind All - A was about 1.76 trillion yuan, a decrease of 9.86% from the previous week. The proportion of rising stocks in Wind All - A increased significantly, and on Friday, the number of rising stocks in the Chinese mainland exceeded 4400 [6]. - The market generally showed the characteristics of "relatively stable indices and changing structural trends". The fluctuations of broad - based indices were generally limited, and the market's risk expectations were temporarily stable. In terms of style, value outperformed growth as a whole. The large - cap value index had a relatively large increase (1.52%), while the large - cap growth index had a relatively large correction (- 1.39%). In terms of industries, the technology sector, which had a large increase since the beginning of this month, had an obvious correction, while the consumer and financial sectors performed strongly [6]. - **Expected Differences among Sectors** - **Consumer Sector**: Recently, relevant policies have been intensively issued, raising positive expectations, but the substantial boost to the sector's profitability still needs to be verified by the implementation of subsequent fiscal and credit tools. It is currently more of a thematic and expected - repair market [6]. - **Non - Banking Financial Sector**: The market rose last week, but the valuation level was still low, indicating that potential positive factors were not fully priced. If the return of funds at the beginning of next year resonates with the improvement of risk appetite, the sector has the potential to achieve resonance between valuation repair and profit improvement [6]. - **Technology Sector**: In the short term, it is greatly affected by negative overseas policy impacts, but the capital preference is strong. With the return of loose capital, it still has support [6]. - **Outlook for Next Year** - In the first half of next year, the most important market will still be before the Spring Festival. Sectors such as securities and technology may experience structural out - performance due to factors such as the nomination of the new Fed Chairman, the return of institutional funds at the beginning of the year, and some micro - events [8]. Investment Recommendations - It is recommended to layout for the key market window in the first half of next year, especially before the Spring Festival. Sectors such as robotics, nuclear power, and commercial aerospace in the technology sector, as well as the non - banking financial sector, are expected to be the main lines of the Spring market. The consumer sector mainly presents phased and thematic trading opportunities, and attention can be paid to service - type consumption such as sports and cultural tourism, as well as sub - sectors such as medical devices that benefit from the aging trend [8]. Economic Calendar - The report mentions paying attention to global economic data, but specific data in the economic calendar are not detailed in the provided content [28].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided regarding the industry investment rating. 2. Core View of the Report This week (December 15 - December 19), the money market rates were divided. The average daily lending of large - scale banks increased month - on - month, and funds slightly increased leverage. The maturity of certificates of deposit (CDs) increased, and the yield curve of CD maturities shifted downward. In terms of spot bond transactions, the main buyers were large - scale banks, mainly increasing their holdings of interest - rate bonds within 3 years and 5 - 10 years. The net buying volume of funds decreased, mainly increasing their holdings of short - term credit bonds. Large - scale insurance companies continued to increase their allocation of ultra - long - term interest - rate bonds of 20 - 30 years, and rural commercial banks mainly sold interest - rate bonds [4]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Money Market - **Open market operations**: There were 668.5 billion yuan of reverse repurchases due this week. The central bank cumulatively injected 657.5 billion yuan of reverse repurchases, and conducted a 60 - billion - yuan outright reverse repurchase on Monday and had a 40 - billion - yuan outright reverse repurchase due on Tuesday. The net liquidity injection for the whole week was 189 billion yuan. Next Thursday, 300 billion yuan of MLF will mature [7][10]. - **Funds price**: As of December 19, R001, R007, DR001, and DR007 were 1.35%, 1.52%, 1.27%, and 1.44% respectively, changing by 0.44BP, 0.73BP, - 0.41BP, and - 2.78BP compared with December 12, and were at the 15%, 9%, 10%, and 3% historical quantiles respectively [12]. - **Large - scale banks' lending**: From December 15 to December 19, the total lending scale of large - scale banks was 22.81 trillion yuan, with a daily maximum lending scale of 4.7 trillion yuan and an average daily lending scale of 4.6 trillion yuan, an increase of 0.17 trillion yuan compared with the previous week's daily average [7][17]. - **Pledged repurchase transactions**: The average daily trading volume was 8.48 trillion yuan, with a daily maximum of 8.63 trillion yuan, a 5% increase compared with the previous week's daily average. The proportion of overnight repurchase transactions increased, with an average daily proportion of 90.0%, a daily maximum of 90.3%, an increase of 0.57 percentage points compared with the previous week's daily average, and as of December 19, it was at the 93.1% quantile [7][19]. 3.2 Certificates of Deposit and Bills - **CD issuance and financing**: The total CD issuance this week was 993.19 billion yuan, an increase of 52.6 billion yuan compared with the previous week. The total maturity was 1062.9 billion yuan, an increase of 450 million yuan compared with the previous week. The net financing was - 69.7 billion yuan, an increase of 51.8 billion yuan compared with the previous week [7][22]. - **By bank type**: State - owned banks had the highest issuance scale. The issuance scales of state - owned banks, joint - stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks changed by 103.75 billion yuan, 7.81 billion yuan, - 69.44 billion yuan, and - 1.64 billion yuan respectively compared with the previous week [22]. - **By maturity type**: The 3 - month CD had the highest issuance scale. The issuance scales of 1 - month, 3 - month, 6 - month, 9 - month, and 1 - year CDs changed by - 30.68 billion yuan, 77.06 billion yuan, - 77.38 billion yuan, 55.07 billion yuan, and 28.19 billion yuan respectively compared with the previous week. The 3 - month CD accounted for the highest proportion (33.64%) of the total issuance of CDs by different types of banks, mainly issued by city commercial banks; the 6 - month CD accounted for 32.61%, mainly issued by state - owned banks [22]. - **CD maturity and yield**: The CD maturity this week increased to 1062.9 billion yuan, an increase of 450 million yuan compared with the previous week. Next week (December 22 - December 26), 882.2 billion yuan of CDs will mature. The yield curve of CD maturities shifted downward. As of December 19, the yields of 1 - month, 3 - month, 6 - month, 9 - month, and 1 - year CDs rated AAA changed by - 0.25BP, - 2BP, - 2.5BP, - 1.75BP, and - 2.5BP respectively compared with December 12 [7][26][34]. - **Bill rates**: As of December 19, the 3 - month direct discount rate, 3 - month transfer discount rate, 6 - month direct discount rate, and 6 - month transfer discount rate of state - owned and joint - stock banks were 0.66%, 0.5%, 0.91%, and 0.95% respectively, changing by 3BP, 4BP, 7BP, and 0BP respectively compared with December 12 [7][36]. 3.3 Institutional Behavior Tracking - **Leverage ratio**: The inter - bank leverage ratio in the bond market increased by 0.21 percentage points to 106.89% as of December 19 compared with December 12, at the 52.7% historical quantile since 2021. The leverage ratios of banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and broad - based funds were 103.5%, 184%, 133.8%, and 104.6% respectively, changing by 0.04BP, 0.46BP, 1.68BP, and 0.01BP respectively compared with December 12, and as of December 19, they were at the 30%, 1%, 95%, and 15% historical quantiles respectively [40][41]. - **Net buying duration**: The central value of the net buying duration of funds rebounded. As of December 19, the weighted average net buying duration of funds (MA = 10) was - 0.75 years, an increase from - 3.52 years on December 12, at the 18% historical quantile. The weighted average net buying duration of wealth management products (MA = 10) was 5.53 years, showing an increase compared with December 19, at the 99% historical quantile. The weighted average net buying duration of rural commercial banks (MA = 10) was - 1.38 years, turning negative compared with December 12, at the 26% historical quantile. The weighted average net buying duration of insurance companies (MA = 10) was 14.39 years, an increase compared with December 12, at the 97% historical quantile [7][43]. - **Duration of pure - bond funds**: As of December 19, the duration of medium - and long - term pure - bond funds increased by 0.03 years to 3.58 years compared with December 12, at the 51% historical quantile since this year. The duration of short - term pure - bond funds increased by 0.09 years to 1.91 years compared with December 12, at the 99% historical quantile since this year [45].